In addition to those costs,
SIRA charges a 20% management fee, as recommended by
Council. This helps SIRA cover costs it doesn’t directly
charge to the water activity, but which nevertheless
relate to it, such as insurance, IT, communications and
accounting.

|
Part
of the pump system located above Bell
Wharf, Scotland Island
|
Have SIRA’s charges kept up with inflation?
In short, no. While the price SIRA charges residents for
water has increased since 2002 in simple dollar terms,
the real price, adjusted for inflation, has decreased by
18% in the same period. So, while most expenses in your
life have increased broadly in line with the CPI,
Scotland Island residents enjoy water that is, in real
terms, considerably cheaper now than it has ever been.
How has SIRA achieved a price reduction in real
terms?
Firstly, the price initially charged by SIRA when it
started selling water back in 2002 was probably an
overshoot. As I explained in my last article, SIRA, with
no history or expertise in the water business, charged
residents what senior managers within Pittwater Council
recommended. With hindsight, the price could have been
set a little lower and SIRA would still have broken
even.
All the same, it’s been the efforts of a number of key
individuals that have helped lower prices. From the
outset these residents created, maintained and
continuously improved the water system. Many weren’t
paid, or weren’t paid adequately, for doing so.
Among a host of other initiatives over the years, the
development of an automated booking system saw a
significant step up in efficiencies and cost reductions.
Does SIRA make a profit or a loss on the water it
buys and sells?
Every year SIRA creates a budget for its forthcoming
financial year. These are used to assist with setting
the prices SIRA charges, such as water-related costs and
the hire rates for our community buildings. The
endeavour of each budget is to break even on SIRA’s
activities for the year. If the organisation reports a
gain for the year, it will probably be because more
water was sold than expected (eg a dry summer). If it
makes a loss, it’s probably because we sold less than
expected.
There are, of course, other unexpected events from time
to time. For instance, in the last financial year there
was a metering error in SIRA’s favour that improved the
results. The Sydney Water meter at Church Point has now
been replaced and we expect that billing for the water
SIRA buys this current financial year will be correct.

|
Solenoid
vales controlling the emergency water
system
|
What do residents think of SIRA’s performance?
The emergency water system is complex, involves many
moving parts and many people. Sometimes a water delivery
doesn’t go to plan.
SIRA periodically surveys its members as to its
operations and did so in 2016 and 2024. In 2024, 80% of
respondents rated the emergency water service as
satisfactory to excellent. The comparable customer
satisfaction rating for Sydney Water is 53%. SIRA
appreciates and values the feedback it receives on
emergency water and all its activities.
Who do we have to thank for all this?
The full roll call of people deserving thanks is far too
long to record here, so what follows are just a few of
those who have volunteered huge amounts of time and
effort, some over many decades. They are also listed in
no particular order:
Rod Smith, John Brogden (former MP and local state
member), Cass Gye, Bill Gye, Nathalie Muir, Colin
Haskell, Tim Turpin, Graeme Crayford, Phil Hebden, Mark
Morgan, John Atkins, Hubert van Mierlo, Sharon Kinnison,
Brian Rodgers, John Marshall, Greg Roberts, Shar Jones,
Deryn Vokins, Guyren Smith, Robert Fox, Nikki Gibson,
Ian Laughton-Smith, Nadine O’Mara, Marie Minslow, Matt
Lakeman, Steve Valenti, Angus Stranack, Jaime Sala,
David Armstrong and Rowena Dubberley.
There will be others I’ve omitted to mention. That
doesn’t diminish the thanks we owe them. To find out
more about the emergency water system, click
here.