Island Vegetation Collection
MONDAY,
AUGUST 22
Please put your
material out as described below, and further in attached brochure and
the Pittwater Offshore Directory
BY SUNDAY, AUGUST 21
- A maximum of 2
cubic metres of vegetation for each household
- Leaf litter,
grass clippings and prunings TO BE PLACED IN HARD SIDED CONTAINERS
- Branches to be
no longer than 1.2m and BUNDLED AND TIED TOGETHER WITH TWINE
- No plastic,
hessian or nylon bags
- No cardboard,
foam or polystyrene boxes
- No soil or
untied bundles
Any material not complying with collection guidelines will be left on
the road side for residents to arrange private collection.
click the image to load the flyer
Animal Matters
One of the lovely things about
living on Scotland Island is the fact there are few fences to separate
neighbours, something which has for us encouraged wonderful friendships
to develop between families. The downside is that large dogs are
roaming the island and are able to wander into anyone’s backyard.
To
come home on Friday and find the roof of our animal hutch knocked off,
a mummy and her three baby guinea pigs dead and our beloved adult male
guinea pig and rabbit missing was a very distressing find for myself
and my three kids. There were large dog paw prints all over the cage
roof, unfortunately no-one was home to see which dog was responsible.
Luckily my daughter’s rabbit was found hiding under our neighbour’s
house. The adult male guinea pig is still missing.
Our
thanks go to Robyn, Tim, Janelle, Amanda and Tyler and Noah for bravely
crawling in under the house in the 2hr rabbit recovery.
If you
have animals in portable cages please make sure they are secure. If you
have dogs and they roam the island please consider my kids who have
lost five pets in what was from the evidence a violent attack.
Lisa, Jessica, Tyler and Harley
Yesterday,
a large dog invaded and killed all of my grand children's guinea pigs
(2
adults and 3 babies). They were in a specially constructed house which
the dog/dogs got into and my daughter came home to find them all dead
on the lawn. My granddaughter's rabbit was not among the bodies and
after hours of searching we found and retrieved her from under the
neighbour's house, luckily.
I have written before about people
letting their dogs walk freely and chasing our chicken when they are
occasionally let out, but this is a case of dogs just wandering around
and causing mayhem. We have the footprints and may call in the dog
squad!
Please contain your dogs.
The second much nicer
matter is that we have a Buff-banded Rail that often visits our garden
- especially when we are working in it. It is always alone and we
suspect it lives nearby as it comes when it hears us at work.
Robyn Iredale
Letter to the Editor
About Kooka's
and Whiteants
Ref:
Rebuttal of a
Vet's View PON 12-18-2011
Thank you Brad, for coming out of the woodwork and giving us all a
lesson in ecology, albeit from a more botanical perspective..
But
really , Kookaburras dying out because they can't eat White ants?? ....
Like they don't eat anything else?? Sorry Brad, but it's really NOT
that simple, and suggests you know no realistic examples on the Island
to support your case.
Even
the echidna has other preferences among
the ant varieties available and is not an obligatory feeder of
termites. Gathering firewood at worst will limit the white
ants and contain their spread. You can also do this (and much
more) by
burning their nests and everything else around it, but then, apart from
the obvious cruelty, you also wipe out an entire
ecosystem which has no hope of recovery before the next hazard
reduction burn
sets the areas biodiversity back another 100.000 years. Remembering,
Brad, that's how long it took to evolve??
I hope Brad's
analogy doesn't represent his real knowledge of ecology after 17 years
of experience as a "Bushi" & just indicates his willingness to
further his cause by distorting the facts; speaking of which, the
following may interest you since he questioned my qualifications on
ecology.
Ecology
is a branch of science. To fully
understand ecology you must first have scientific qualifications not
the least of which is a science degree which the people
whose articles Brad refers to, possess. Veterinarians
have
these basic
science qualifications as they are a stepping stone to specialising in
animal health, not just domesticated animals but also wildlife. We are
the people scientists and researchers turn to for our knowledge when
things aren't going right (Ulcers in Tassie Devils, Chlamydia in
Koalas, Parasites in snakes, fungal rot in 'possums etc). Disease
prevention is as important as their treatment. As a kid raised in the
bush my fascination for all that creeps and crawls and a desire to make
them better when sick is what led me to where I am now.
Debunking
an article by discrediting its author is a tactic employed to stifle
debate and is all too often successful, people fear to comment lest
they get shot down in flames. So I will refrain from personal
commentary unless it's to defend personally disparaging remarks.
Brad,
17 yrs of experience are no substitute for an education. This is not to
say experience isn't valuable, it is, but without the proper background
qualifications a psuedoscientist will need a lot more guidance.
..."Man's gotta know his limitations".
Biodiversity is the
key to ecology, and implies flora AND fauna, down to the smallest
microorganisms breaking down organic matter and supplying larger
organisms eg trees, with the necessary nutrients that they require for
growth .Small mobile creatures contribute by spreading seeds,
fertilising the area with droppings which are in turn broken down
further by a whole host of critters from the dung beetle on thus
accelerating the process of recycling nutrients. The greater the
biodiversity the more sustainable an ecosystem is. The older and more
stable the ecosystem (undisturbed) the greater the population it can
sustain.
To say that back burning is somehow beneficial to
the maintenance of an ecosystem displays an appalling lack of
understanding of what makes the whole thing tick. Lightning strikes
causing bushfires are a rare natural cataclysmic event (when
did
this last happen on the island ) and rate among tsunamies and volcanic
eruptions as nature's most devastating. Like wounds resulting in
scars.There are a very few native plant species that are tolerant of,
let alone benefit from fire and you don't need to lay waste
to an
entire habitat to accommodate these, leave that to lightning. Our
Island's ecology managed to evolve for many thousands of years without
the need for human "help" - relying solely on natural events however
infrequent. Consider also that lightning is usually associated with
rain providing a natural "brake". Of course the traditional custodians
also burnt areas of forest ( and collected firewood ), but they did not
do this to preserve biodiversity as much as to consume what
emerged. Add to this the fact that this is an isolated island
community with no hope of being repopulated by flightless creatures
from large neighbouring intact areas as is the case
on the
mainland., and we can surmise that what is killed is permanently lost
to this area. The remnant population is/has become too sparse
to
breed successfully, and the remaining ground cover too thin to
adequately ensure the survival of their young ( If you can see right
down to the mulch layer you've no adequate groundcover)
This
not only applies to back burning but also to overzealous clearing of
bushland to the point where only a few spindly native plant species
remain, with no ground cover to encourage protection and moisture
retention essential for biodiversity. This in turn denies also native
species essential nutrients. It takes too long for the previous balance
to be restored to an area to encourage previous inhabitants to return
to what it was that attracted them in the first place,- when it has to
start from scratch. Animals driven from "their" area become refugees
for years and face a hostile unfamiliar future in foreign territory
(Territorialism)-- the death rate is high
It is all very
well to quote (from) scientific articles but "lay"
scientists and
those on crusades have a habit of selectively picking out information
that supports their point of view regardless of whether or not it is
within context Usually this is unintentional. - they just don't possess
the necessary knowledge to judge and think it's "just that
simple". The climate debate is a classic example with all manner
of unqualified statements from unqualified people.
Bottom
line; an Ecosystem evolves very, VERY slowly and can adjust
to
very small and SLOW incremental changes in the
environment,
it does not possess the ability to adjust to rapid, abrupt
changes and this applies to all manner of ( human induced )
domestication of the landscape,
Better
to cause small adaptable changes by collecting firewood with minimal
disturbance of the ecosystem ----- or just napalm the area every so
often when we think it's time and be done with it !!??
Tough Choice.
Ray The Vet BVSc (Syd Uni)
Luvya2Brad
Gone Fishing Gallery August
Newsletter
click image to load full size
PDF
WALKING IN THE SHOES OF AN
ARRERNTE WOMAN
ELDER
An Interactive
Workshop presented by M.K. TURNER OAM
SUNDAY 11 SEPTEMBER, 10AM –12PM
111 RICHARD RD,
SCOTLAND ISLAND
click image to load full size
PDF with details
The
Online Local Contact Guide
Click
HERE to load
The
views expressed in this newsletter are not necessarily the views of the
Scotland Island Residents Association (SIRA), or
the Western
Pittwater Community Association (WPCA)
|