The Urban Dharma Newsletter - February, 2011
In This Issue: Happiness in Buddhism
1. Can Buddhists transcend mental reservations? – By Steve Connor
2. Buddhism and Happiness – by Marelisa Fabrega
3. What is Happiness in Buddhism? – by Rev. Nobuo Haneda
4. Sitting Quietly, Doing Something – by DANIEL GOLEMAN
Happy New Year… This UD Newsletter is about Happiness… What is happiness and how do we find it.
A couple of weeks ago I gave a talk on “Happiness” at the Center for Spiritual Living in Simi Valley, CA… You can find the MP3 at:
“If you're respectful by habit,
constantly honoring the worthy,
four things increase:
long life, beauty,
1. Can Buddhists transcend mental reservations? – By Steve Connor / Science Editor
Buddhists who meditate may be able to train their brains to feel genuine happiness and control aggressive instincts, research has shown.
According to Owen Flanagan, professor of philosophy at Duke University in North Carolina, Buddhists appear to be able to stimulate the left prefrontal lobe - an area just behind the forehead - which may be why they can generate positive emotions and a feeling of well being.
Writing in today's New Scientist, Professor Flanagan cites early findings of a study by Richard Davidson, of the University of Wisconsin, who used scanners to analyse the active regions of a Buddhist's brain.
Professor Flanagan said the findings are "tantalising" because the left prefrontal lobes of Buddhist practitioners appear to "light up" consistently, rather than just during acts of meditation.
"This is significant, because persistent activity in the left prefrontal lobes indicates positive emotions and good mood," he writes. "The first Buddhist practitioner studied by Davidson showed more left prefrontal lobe activity than anyone he had ever studied before.
"Buddhists are not born happy. It is not reasonable to suppose that Tibetan Buddhists are born with a 'happiness gene'. The most reasonable hypothesis is there is something about conscientious Buddhist practice that results in the kind of happiness we all seek," he writes.
Another study of Buddhists by scientists at the University of California has also found that meditation might tame the amygdala, the part of the brain involved with fear and anger.
Professor Flanagan writes: "Antidepressants are currently the favoured method for alleviating negative emotions, but no antidepressant makes a person happy. On the other hand, Buddhist meditation and mindfulness, which were developed 2,500 years before Prozac, can lead to profound happiness.”
2. Buddhism and Happiness – by Marelisa Fabrega
Henepola Gunaratana is a Sri Lankan Buddhist monk who has taught graduate level courses on Buddhism at several universities in the United States, including Georgetown University, American University, and the University of Maryland, College Park. He has also written extensively on the subject of Buddhism.
The message of the Buddha is traditionally known as the Four Noble Truths. The last of these four truths sets out eight steps to happiness, which are: skillful understanding, skillful thinking, skillful speech, skillful action, skillful livelihood, skillful effort, skillful mindfulness, and skillful concentration.
Gunaratana explains in his book "Eight Mindful Steps to Happiness", that the Buddha's path is grounded in common sense and in careful observation of reality. The Buddha understood that if we looked carefully at our lives we would realize that the choices we make lead to either happiness or unhappiness. And once we understand this principle thoroughly, we will be able to make good choices, because we want to happy.
Gunaratana adds the following: "The basis of Buddhist morality is that acting in unskillful ways leads to unhappy results, and acting in skillful ways leads to happy results. This simple principle of cause and effect is an aspect of what Buddhists call kamma (or karma)."
The Buddha pointed to ten actions which are always unskillful because they inevitably lead to suffering for both the doer and the recipient:
o Sexual misconduct
o Malicious words
o Harsh language
o Useless talk
o Ill will
o Wrong view of the nature of reality
In addition, any action that comes from a mind that is filled with greed, hatred, or delusion leads to suffering and is therefore unskillful or wrong.
Once we understand that everything we think, say, or do is a cause, which will inevitably lead to some effect, we will naturally want to think, say, and do things which will lead to positive results. At the same time, we will avoid having thoughts, saying things, and doing things that will lead to negative results. Taking this approach will allow us to focus our attention on making choices that will lead to a happier life.
In order to act wrongfully, Gunaratana adds, you have to be lying to yourself about cause and effect. That is, you would be acting against the basic truth that actions have consequences. If you train yourself to be mindful of what you do, and ask yourself whether it's likely to lead to positive or negative results, you'll be heading in the right direction. You'll be heading toward happiness.
3. What is Happiness in Buddhism? – by Rev. Nobuo Haneda
Let me discuss one of the most basic questions in our life, “What is happiness?”
About ten years ago, after a seminar held in a Buddhist temple in Seattle, a university student approached me and said to me, “Dr. Haneda, I am writing a paper on human happiness. I am comparing various religious definitions of happiness. Could you give me a Buddhist definition?” I answered, “If you can forget your individual happiness, that’s the happiness defined in Buddhism. If the issue of your happiness ceases to be an issue, that’s the happiness defined in Buddhism.” Then the student asked me, “How, then, can we forget ourselves, our individual happiness?” I answered him, “If you intentionally attempt to forget yourself or your happiness, you will not be able to do so. But if you encounter something more powerful than yourself something more important than your happiness, then you wifi be able to forget yourself and your happiness.”
From morning to night, we are concerned with our individual welfare, with questions such as what we should eat and wear. Many of us believe that our happiness depends on how successfully we satisfy those personal needs. But is it really the case that our happiness depends on that? No, I do not think so. Actually, the more self-centered we become, the less happy we become.
Generally speaking, who is an unhappy person? An unhappy person is a person who cannot forget himself, being always concerned with his individual happiness and welfare. Probably the Buddhist concept of “hell” symbolizes the condition in which one has only himself, only his self-concerns such as what he should eat and wear. Then, who is a happy person? A happy person is the person who can forget himself, his individual happiness. He is so fascinated with something outside himself that he can forget himself. A lover is happy because he is thinking of his girl friend, forgetting himself. An artist is happy because he is absorbed in a creative activity, forgetting himself.
Now let me further discuss what “happiness” means in Buddhism. The following words of the Zen master Dogen (1200-53) are probably the best definition of human happiness as well as of Buddhism:
Studying Buddhism means studying the self. Studying the self means forgetting the self Forgetting the self means being attained by [the spirit that is one with] tens of thousands of things.
—‘Genjo-koan~ Volume in the Shobo-genzo
The first sentence, “Studying Buddhism means studying the self,” clearly defines Buddhism as nothing but self-examination. However, two ways of understanding the first sentence are possible. Depending on which way of understanding we have, we will end up in taking two totally different directions in Buddhism. The two ways are as follows.
First way: When a person is told that Buddhism is a way of self-examination, he thinks that he should focus his attention only on the pursuit of his personal happiness. He thinks that he should be exclusively concerned with the issue of his individual salvation all the time. Thinking this way, he deepens his self-love and self-centeredness.
Second way: When a person is told that Buddhism is a way of self-examination, he focuses his attention on examining the real nature of the self. Then he discovers that the self is nothing worth loving or cherishing. Thinking this way, he becomes less self-attached, less self-centered.
When we start to study Buddhism, it is often inevitable that we take the first way. We initially study Buddhism because we are concerned with the issue of our individual happiness. But Dogen says that in the course of self-examination, the initial self-centered mentality that seeks individual happiness alone must be transformed. When he says, “Studying the self means forgetting the self,” he indicates that true self-examination should end up in discovering the self as something worth forgetting.
The most crucial question is “How can we forget the self?” The answer is that we must meet something powerful and overwhelming. Then, what is powerful and overwhelming in Buddhism? It is the spirit of the bodhisattva (the seeker of Buddhahood). Nothing else can make us forget the self. When Dogen says, “Forgetting the self means being attained by [the spirit that is one with] tens of thousands of things,” he means that the self should meet the spirit of the bodhisattva and be replaced by it. Then, what is the spirit of the bodhisattva? Dogen defmes it as follows:
Awakening “the spirit of the bodhisattva (bodhicitta)” means awakening the aspiration (or vow) that says, “Before I myself cross over to the other shore, I will take all sentient beings across first.”
—“Hotsu-bodaishin” Volume in the Shobo-genzo
The bodhisattva spirit is the spirit that is concerned with the happiness of all sentient beings, forgetting his own happiness. This self-forgetting spirit of the bodhisattva is powerful. Only when we meet this spirit and become overwhelmed and permeated by it, can we forget ourselves, our own happiness. We usually do not think it possible to identify with such a noble spirit. But, when we actually meet a person who possesses the powerful bodhisattva spirit and become overwhelmed by it, we can experience a spiritual transformation and can forget the self.
So long as we seek our own happiness, we will never be able to attain it. But when we meet the bodhisattva spirit, we can forget our own happiness. This self-forgetfulness, however, is actually the experience of our true happiness. This true happiness (or self-forgetfulness) is nothing that we can actively realize or “attain.” it is something that is realized from the side of the Buddha or Dharma, without any recourse to our own practical abilities. That is why Dogen uses the word “attained” in his statement, “Forgetting the self means being attained by [the spirit that is one with] tens of thousands of things.”
Now let me discuss the same issue within the context of the Jodo Shinshu. The bodhisattva spirit (that aspires to take all sentient beings across first before doing so oneself) is the spiritual basis of the bodhisattva Dharmakara and of his Vow that he made to become Amida Buddha. (The story of the bodhisattva Dharmakara’s becoming Amida Buddha is told in a text called the Larger Sukhavativyuha-sutra.) If I summarize in one sentence the gist of Dharmakara’s Vow, he is saying, “If all sentient beings are not liberated (i.e., if they all do not appear to me as expressions of the truth), I will not attain my liberation.” In his Vow he is expressing his aspiration to “take all sentient beings across first before doing so himself.”
Dharmakara is not concerned with his own individual liberation. He is concerned with the liberation of all sentient beings, forgetting his own liberation. But his being concerned with all sentient beings’ liberation is actually his liberation. Being able to forget his own liberation is itself his liberation.
Now let me talk about King Ajatasatru. Shinran Shonin (1173-1262) identified himself with this king. The famous story of King Ajatasatru is told in the Nirvana Sutra.
King Ajatasatru is a historical example of the most evil person (icchantika). When he was a prince, he killed his father, the king, and usurped his throne. Further, he attempted to kill his mother. Although he did not kill her, he imprisoned her. But later he started to feel tremendous remorse for having committed such hideous transgressions.
Several spiritual teachers attempted to console Ajatasatru, but his spiritual sickness was not cured. Finally, when Jivaka, a Buddhist physician, advised the king to visit Shakyainuni, he decided to do so. When the king and Jivaka started to travel, the king asked Jivaka to ride on the same elephant because he feared that he might fall off the elephant, die, and go to hell. The king said to Jivaka, ‘Please hold me and keep me from falling. For I have heard in the past that the person who has attained the way does not fall into hell.”
While the king was traveling to see Shakyamuni, he learned of Shakyamuni’s words, “For the sake of Ajatasatru, I will not enter nirvana.” Jivaka told the king that although Shakyamuni was concerned with the welfare of all sentient beings, he was particularly concerned with people like Ajatasatru, who have committed evil.
Having learned about the compassionate heart of Shakyamuni, the king was deeply moved. Having recognized the remarkable contrast between Shakyamuni’s mind (that was concerned with the welfare of suffering sentient beings) and his own mind (that was concerned only with his personal welfare), the king became ashamed of himself. When the king met Shakyamuni, he received teachings from him and experienced liberation. He, then, awakened the bodhisattva spirit. He came up with an extraordinary statement, “World-honored one, if I can thoroughly destroy the evil minds of sentient beings, it is all right with me if I were to dwell in the Avici hell constantly for innumerable kalpas, undergoing great suffering for the sake of sentient beings. I would not consider it pain.”
Initially, when the king was concerned only with his individual welfare, he was afraid of falling into hell. But, now when he had awakened the bodhisattva spirit, he was concerned with the welfare of all sentient beings, forgetting his own welfare. Now he said that he would willingly go into hell if he could help sentient beings.
The king compares himself to an eranda tree, a tree with the worst odor, and Shakyamuni to a candana tree, a tree with the most exquisite fragrance. He said, “Now for the first time I see a candana tree growing from an eranda seed.” In this way, the king describes the spiritual miracle that he has experienced, having met Shakyamuni.
Now let me talk about Shinran Shonin. For twenty years, from age nine to twentynine, Shinran engaged in various practices on Mt. Hiei in an attempt to attain Buddhahood. But those practices did not lead him to Buddhahood. Not only was he unable to become a Buddha, but also he was feeling more and more depressed, frustrated, and miserable as he intensified his practices. He could not understand what was wrong.
When Shinran was twenty-nine, he met Honen Shonin. It was through this meeting that Shinran was liberated. When Shinran met Honen, he saw in him the bodhisattva spirit of Dharmakara. Honen was permeated with the bodhisattva spirit. He was concerned with the happiness of all sentient beings, forgetting his own happiness. I believe that Honen’s spirit, the self-forgetting spirit, shouted at Shinran this way:
Shinran, what are you doing? You say that you are seeking Buddhahood. But, after all, aren’t you thinking only about your individual happiness? Aren’t you concerned only with your individual liberation? Shinran, you are dead wrong in your approach. You are just using Buddhism for self-enhancement, for self-love.
Listening to the voice of Honen, Shinran was deeply shaken by it and recognized his mistake. He realized that he was no different from Ajatasatru. Just like the king who saw the bodhisattva spirit in Shakyamuni and became ashamed of his self-centeredness, Shinran saw the bodhisattva spirit in Honen and became ashamed of his selfcenteredness.
Before Shinran met Honen, Shinran lived in a world of self-love, but he did not know it. Honen’s spirit of the bodhisattva challenged Shinran and made a crack in his world of self-love. Then cool fresh air started to gush into his world. When Shinran experienced the cool fresh air gushing into his world, he realized that he had been living in a world of self-love.
Honen’s spirit, the cool fresh air, made Shinran recognize that he had been living in “a garbage can” and that the entirety of the self had been nothing but “a garbage can.” He had earlier believed that he could fmd something pure and fragrant in the garbage can and could increase the purity and fragrance. But, now he recognized it was a mistake. He realized that there was only stinkiness in the garbage can. Even what he considered purity in it was another form of stinkiness.
Thus he no longer considered the self, the garbage can, important. Now he considered the self worth forgetting. Being overwhelmed and permeated by Honen’s spirit, the fresh air, Shinran shifted his focus from the self to the spirit that Honen embodied, from the garbage can to the fresh air. In this way Shinran’s spiritual basis was totally changed.
Shmran called the spirit of Dharmakara that he saw in Honen “Innermost Aspiration (hongan).” He considered the Power of the Innermost Aspiration (hongan-riki) the most important thing in Buddhism. He believed that it alone could bring about spiritual revolution in human beings and could make them fulfill their lives. He also referred to this power as the Power Beyond the Self (ta-riki) and the Inconceivable Power (fukashigi-riki). Since this power is the basic theme of the Larger Sukhavativyuha-sui~, he considered this sutra the most important text for him.
Initially, when we are told that Buddhism is a way of self-examination, of self-focusedness, we think that we should pursue our personal liberation. Thus we engage in various practices. Many people continue this orientation throughout their lives and never recognize the deep self-love that exists at the basis of their practices.
But Buddhist teachers tell us that a radical transformation of our spiritual basis must take place. We must know that our ultimate liberation is not realized through the efforts we make on the basis of self-love. True liberation is nothing we can “attain.” It is realized and “attained” from the side of the Buddha, or the Dharma. We must experience the total transformation of our spiritual basis by encountering the spirit of the bodhisattva.
As long as the Power of the Innermost Aspiration remains a mere doctrinal concept, it does not mean much to us; we cannot experience any deep spiritual transformation. But if we, like Ajatasatru or Shinran, actually meet a person who has the Power of the Innermost Aspiration, a spiritual revolution that our ego-consciousness would never have considered possible takes place. When we are shaken and overwhelmed by this power, we resonate with it and can forget our individual happiness or liberation. This self-forgetfulness is actually the realization of our true happiness or liberation.
4. Sitting Quietly, Doing Something – by DANIEL GOLEMAN
I recently spent an evening with Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche, the Tibetan lama who has been dubbed “the happiest man in the world.” True, that title has been bestowed upon at least a few extremely upbeat individuals in recent times. But it is no exaggeration to say that Rinpoche is a master of the art of well-being.
So how did he get that way? Apparently, the same way you get to Carnegie Hall. Practice.
I’ve had the pleasure of knowing Rinpoche a bit over the years, and always found him in good cheer. This meeting was no different. When I called him at his Manhattan hotel to arrange to get together before we were to discuss his new book, “Joyful Wisdom” at the 92nd St. Y, he told me he was in the middle of a shower – but not in the usual sense. The shower, he told me, had run out of hot water midway. When he called the front desk, he was told to wait several minutes and there would be more hot water. In this situation, I probably would have been peeved. But as Rinpoche told me this, he was laughing and laughing.
The only momentary glitch I’ve witnessed — a few years back — was slapstick: he sat down in an office chair with a faulty seat that suddenly plunged several inches with a thump. Once when this chair had done the same to me I cursed and groused about it for a while. But Rinpoche just frowned for a second — and the next moment he was his upbeat self again. Quickness of recovery time from upsets is one way science takes the measure of a happy temperament.
While annoyances like these are hardly life’s greatest tests, handling them gracefully takes a composure that few of us seem to have at our disposal.
Mingyur Rinpoche was not born into wealth and comfort. He spent his earliest years in a remote Himalayan village lacking even the most basic amenities. Nor was he a lucky winner in the genetic lottery for moods. In his book he recounts being extremely anxious as a child in Nepal, having had what a Manhattan psychiatrist would likely diagnose as panic attacks, and how he cured himself of this chronic anxiety by making his fears the focus of his meditation. He has had to earn his good cheer.
Rinpoche seems eclectic in studying paths to well-being, including Western recipes. A few years ago, he attended a five-day meeting at the Mind & Life Institute that brought together a group of neuroscientists and the Dalai Lama to discuss ways to overcome destructive emotions. He found that the Western scientific findings on emotions had much in common with his own approach to cultivating well-being.
But when it comes to his own pursuit of happiness, Buddhist theory and practice are Rinpoche’s chosen tools. He has done several years-long meditation retreats, under the tutelage of some of the most renowned Tibetan masters. Of course, what we mean by “happiness” can be elusive, what with the myriad varieties of good feeling running from ecstasy to equanimity. One flavor of happiness at which Rinpoche seems to excel has been well-studied by scientists specializing in how emotions operate in our brains.
Richard Davidson, who heads the Laboratory for Affective Neuroscience at the University of Wisconsin, has found one distinct brain profile for happiness. As Davidson’s laboratory has reported, when we are in distress, the brain shows high activation levels in the right prefrontal area and the amygdala. But when we are in an upbeat mood, the right side quiets and the left prefrontal area stirs. When showing this brain pattern, people report feeling, as Davidson put it to me, “positively engaged, goal-directed, enthusiastic, and energetic.”
Mingyur Rinpoche came to Davidson’s lab as one of a dozen or so meditation adepts, each of whom had put in anywhere between 10,000 and 50,000 lifetime hours of meditation. Research on expertise in any skill shows that world-class champs have put in at least 10,000 hours of practice; these were Olympic-level meditators.
One of the first findings from the research showed that when these adepts meditated on compassion, activity in key brain areas increased up to 100 percent, notably more than was the case in a control group who were taught the same meditation practice. The more lifetime hours of practice, the greater the increases tended to be. All this seems to confirm the idea that in the realm of positive moods, as in nearly every endeavor, worldly or spiritual, practice matters.
So can we all get a taste of Rinpoche’s bliss?
Davidson worked with Jon Kabat-Zinn, a teacher of mindfulness meditation from the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, to see how a group of novices might gain from these methods. Kabat-Zinn, who has pioneered this contemplative method with medical patients to ease their symptoms, taught mindfulness at a high-stress biotech company; these beginners meditated for 30 minutes a day for eight weeks. Davidson’s measures showed that after the eight weeks they had begun to activate that left prefrontal zone more strongly — and were saying that instead of feeling overwhelmed and hassled, they were enjoying their work. So while the Calvinist strain in American culture may look askance at someone sitting quietly in meditation, this kind of “doing nothing” seems to do something remarkable after all.
Of course, there’s no guarantee of greater happiness from meditation, but the East has given us a promising path for its pursuit.
Another fruit of these spiritual practices seems to be a healthy dose of humility. When Rinpoche told my wife that he was being billed as “the happiest man in the world,” he laughed as though that were the funniest joke he’d ever heard.
Daniel Goleman reported on the brain and behavioral sciences for The New York Times for 12 years. He is the author of several books, including his most recent, “Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything.” His Web site is www.DanielGoleman.info.
The Urban Dharma Newsletter Archives:
The Los Angeles Buddhist-Catholic Dialogue:
Support www.UrbanDharma.org with a Donation:
The Urban Dharma Podcast and Audio Dharma Talks: