e lam
Forward this email to a friend
 
IN THIS ISSUE:
  
 
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
March 26th 2017 Newsletter
 
 
Why Obama Care is Still the Law of the Land
 
 
Despite Trump’s lobbying and arm twisting the deeply flawed Obama Care replacement law was withdrawn from consideration last week after moderate Republicans joined the Freedom Caucus House members in refusing to support the bill.  The bill was developed in secret, without debate or negotiation over the details, pushed by Speaker Paul Ryan as a binary choice; take it or leave it.
 
Ryan of course is Republican so this was a gift to the liberal press who trumped another “fail” for Trump and buttressed their already rabid attacks against Trump and other conservative leaders. But is Ryan really a Republican?   Meet his wife, Janna Ryan.
 
Born in Madill Oklahoma, Janna Christine Little became a powerful Washington D.C. lobbyist after graduating from Wellesley College and then George Washington University with a law degree.   She lived in Washington D.C. for about ten years before meeing Paul Ryan on her 30th birthday.
 
Janna Ryan’s parents were wealthy and politically connected lawyers from Madill Oklahoma.  She attended the same college as her mother, then after graduation she worked as a congressional aide, then as a corporate lobbyist with clients such as Blue Cross Blue Sheild, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Marathon Oil, UPS, and the  Cigar Association of America.  She produced millions of dollars of income for her lobbying firm until she met Paul Ryan, married in Oklahoma, then moved to Paul Ryan’s hometown of Janesville, Wisconsiin.
 
Paul Ryan ran as Mitt Romney’s VP in 2012 and lost to Obama/Biden. 
 
His wife Janna had gone to the same liberal college as Hillary Clinton, Cokie Roberts,  and Madeline Albright.
 
Janna Ryan has deep Democratic roots.  Her father Reuel Little founded a third political party in Oklahoma in 1968 in order to get Democratic Presidential Candidate George Wallace on the ballot.   Reuel ran for Governor in 1970 and received only 4% of the vote.   His son in law David Boren ran for Congress in 1974 and won.  That’s right, her uncle is none other than David Boren, former Democrat Senator and current head of OU. 
 
  Janna worked for former Democrat U.S. Representative Bill Brewster as a congressional aide for years. 
 
Once Janna’s mother died in 2010 she became a millionaire from the inheritance.
 
And people wonder why the Republicans couldn’t put together a bill to defeat Obama Care….
 
 
 
The Yellow Peril Defeated
Comrade Yen Begs Senate to Reconsider to no Avail
 
Communist leaning and tyrannical Senator Edwin Yen faced humiliation last week as he begged the Senate to reconsider his SB83, the bill that would have forced parents to submit their children to vaccination even if they had religious or medical reasons for not vaccinating.   The tyrannical dictator wanna be desperately watered down his bill before the final vote but the legislation failed anyway, stripping Comrade Yen of much of his reputation  as the one thing that politicians can’t support is a loser that is vectoring the wrath of the voting public upon an issue.
 
The vote was on a motion to reconsider.   Below is a list of the socialistic bastards that believe that the state has more ownership of your children than you do:
    YEAS:   22
  Bass  Floyd  Pederson  Sharp  Bergstrom  Jech   Pemberton   Smalley   Bice  Kidd    Pittman    Sparks  Dossett       Matthews   Pugh    Yen     Dugger        McCortney   Rader   Fields      Paxton        Scott        
    
 Below is the list of state senators that did the right thing and voted against this communistic power grab to control your children:
 
   NAYS:   17
 
  Allen   Leewright    Silk  Thompson  Brecheen   Marlatt   Simpson  Treat  Dahm  Newberry   Standridge   Daniels  Newhouse Stanislawski       David   Shaw   Sykes   
 
Below is the list of the cowards who preferred to dodge the vote and betray the parents in their Senate Districts:
 
    Boggs    Fry  Holt  Quinn  Brown   Griffin   Loveless  Schulz
 
 
The principle House author of Comrade Yen’s bill was Representative Chris Kannaday, a member of the small team of men that control Speaker Charles McCall.   This sort of thing is exactly why Donald Trump steamrolled the RINO Republicans in 2016 and it is why Republicans will begin to lose seats all across the U.S. if the conservative Republicans don’t put adults in charge of policy and legislation.
 
At least the evil legislation is dead although we can expect Comrade Yen to attempt to force the legislation through using other means and bring it back at the next opportunity if we allow the communist sympathizer to remain in office.
 
 
 
Bridenstine Town Hall
 
 
Tuesday, April 11 at 6 PM
 
 
 
More Pre Trial Release = More Crime on the Streets
 
Oklahoma Special Judges Illegally
Release Criminals with No Bail Bond
 
Literally a Life of Crime Nets Ten Days in State Prison
From 19 years old till 34 Years Old a Constant Stream of Crime and Arrests
 
Neco Lashon Gay,  4-27-1983
 
 
 
Neco L Gay is a good example of commercial bail versus pre trial release.  Numerous times she has been released from jail by commercial bail and each time the bondsman has been responsible to locate and return her to jail.  State law is very specific about who can be released on "own recognizance" releases and who can issue that release. 
 
The info below is not in sequence because Neco Gay had so many overlapping arrests and so many failure to appear charges that by May 4th 2013 even the bondsmen refused to write a bail bond on the woman.
 
We do not believe that Neco Gay was eligible for release under the program without the approval of a District Judge.  Neco Gay has two (2) prior felony convictions and has failed to appear repeatedly, even after being released by a Special Judge on pretrial release. As of July 2, 2014 she has an active warrant for failing to appear in court.
 
 
 
Court records show Neco Gay was arrested for Child Endangerment, after former conviction of a felony allegedly committed on November 17, 2012 and charged in Oklahoma County case CF-2012-7801.  She was ordered released from the jail on an own recognizance release by Special Judge Susan Johnson on May 23, 2013.  Now remember that only a District Judge can release someone on an OR or own recongnizance.  In other words, no bondsman need be hired.  
 
 
After appearing on two hearing dates she failed to appear December 16, 2013 for a preliminary hearing conference in front of Special Judge Susan Johnson.   Court records show that the warrant issued was cleared on March 10, 2014, meaning that she had been arrested on that date for the failure to appear in court.  March 27, 2014 Special Judge Susan Johnson orders Neco Gay to be released from the jail on her word that she will appear in court on May 13, 2014 and that she will follow the rules set out by the pre trial release case worker.  Legally  Special Judge Susan Johnson cannot release such a person on OR, only a District Judge.  
 
 
Court records show that the pretrial release case worker filed a violation of the condition of release on April 4, 2014 and April 28, 2014.  Neco Gay failed to appear in court May 13, 2014.  She did not even appear once after being released a second time on "pre trial release".  As of July 3, 2014 she has a warrant for her arrest showing on the Oklahoma County Sheriff warrant search page.
 
 
Neco Gay has a long history of crime. Oklahoma County case number CF-2005-5548 shows a charge of forgery in the second degree on September 19, 2005.   A guilty plea was entered on March 16, 2007 and the defendant received a five (5) year suspended sentence with five (5) weekends to do in the county jail.  September 24, 2007 a warrant was issued for a revocation of the suspended sentence due to a failure to complete the terms agreed to by Neco Gay.  She bonded out of jail on January 25,  2008 and failed to appear for arraignments, the very first court appearance on February 4, 2008.  The bondsman agrees to assist Neco Gay again and posts a second bond on February 12, 2008. After three (3) court appearances, Neco Gay fails to appear in court on July 23, 2008 and a warrant is issued for her arrest and a bondsman picked her up to return her to jail. 
 
In both of the above cases Neco Gay was picked up by her bondsmen and returned to the jail.
 
 
August 5, 2008 the warrant issue is cleared and Neco Gay is in custody in the Oklahoma County jail.  September 3, 2008 another agreement with the court is entered and she is released from the jail.  January 2, 2009 Neco Gay has a warrant issued for her arrest for failing to comply with the terms agreed to just four (4) months prior.  Another agreement with the court is made to fulfill her obligations, yet on September 16, 2009 a warrant for her arrest is issued.  She is released from the jail by a bondsman posting a bond on December 7, 2009 and then on February 16, 2010 she fails to appear in court as ordered.  Again she is returned by a bondsman and again on March 25, 2010 she is released by a bondsman’s signature and she enters into an agreement to complete the terms of her probation.
 
On October 26, 2011 a warrant is issued for the arrest of Neco Gay for a revocation of probation, she is arrested, a bondsman posts a bond and she fails to appear in court.  The bondsman returns her to custody and she appears in court on May 7, 2013 she is released on her word that she will reappear in court ordered. On December 17, 2013 she fails to appear and is arrested again on March 10, 2014 for the warrant in the revocation of probation and the failure to appear in the new case Oklahoma
 
 
 
Oklahoma County case CF-2003-6199 shows a conviction for Larceny of merchandise from a retailer.  Neco Gay pled guilty and was sentenced to 1 year suspended sentence and fines.  According to the online court record the fines and fees are unpaid. 
 
 
 
Oklahoma County case Cf-2002-2325 is an embezzlement by employee allegedly occurring on January 28, 2002.  Neco Gay entered a plea of guilty and will receive a deferred sentence if she completes the agreed terms.  The case was finally dismissed on May 12, 2004 after a violation of probation and Two (2) failure to appears in court, both after being released from jail by bail bond companies.
 
Every single time Neco Gay was bonded out of jail by a bondsman she was quickly arrested and returned to jail when she missed a court date.   Every single time she was released on  OR without a bond she didn't make any of the court dates until the police just happened to run across her on other arrests.
 
Neco Gay ultimately received six months sentence in state prison from 2002 till 2016 for all of these crimes including child endangerment.  And how much actual prison time did she actually serve?   January 8th of 2015 she shows up in Lexington and leaves Lexington January 17th 2015.  Ten days in jail total in 17 years of crime.
 
In the meantime Oklahoma County spends $2,000,000.00 per year on the pre trial release program and the criminals pay nearly zero in court costs or fines to pay for their cost to society.  Police arrest and re arrest the same criminals over and over again and the judges give the same criminals break after break after break.  Meanwhile the bondsmen are in danger of being driven out of business because the judges are releasing criminals with histories of refusing to show up to court.
 
And the soft on crime crowd wants more pre trial relase.  The soft on crime crowd wants fewer people to go to prison.
 
 
 
 
Konawa Tea Party
(4th) Tuesday March 28, 2017 7:00 - 9:00 PM
Kennedy Library - The Dougan Room
Konawa School, 701 W South Street
 
Invited Speakers:
Ed Hopper & Family
Any & all Candidates will be introduced!
Jenni White of R.O.P.E.
 
 
 
 
Fool the Media with Deception
The Stealth Jihad
By the Watchman
 
We feel reasonably certain that everyone has heard about the incident involving an Oklahoma State Representative, Muslim students and representatives of CAIR. There are a few things that were left out of the reports seen on television and reported in newspapers that we felt you should be made aware of. What brought this to our attention was this article Oklahoma lawmaker receiving backlash after asking Muslim students to fill out ‘hateful’ questionnaire before meeting with them. We do encourage our readers to open the link and read the article. We will put the entire article in this newsletter, with the only corrections being spelling corrections. At the end we’ll give you a few additional subjects to think about. These are facts not mentioned in the article that the television news and newspapers were hoping no one would bring to your attention.
 
Rep. John Bennett confirmed to the Tulsa World that three Muslim students visiting his office as part of Muslim Day were given questionnaires. 
 
The handout reportedly included questions like “Sharia law says that it must rule over the kafirs, the non-Muslims. Do you agree with this?” “The Koran, the sunna of Mohammed and Sharia Law of all schools says that the husband can beat his wife. Do you beat your wife?”
 
Bennett told the newspaper that he did not speak to the students personally, but added that the questions are based on Islamic texts.
According to the Qur’an, Hadith and Islamic Law a woman may indeed have physical harm done to her if the circumstances warrant, with one such allowance being in the case of disobedience. This certainly does not mean that all Muslim men beat their wives, only that Islam permits them to do so.” Bennett said.
 
We will interject ourselves here and ask that you highlight this next paragraph not for what it says but for what it doesn’t say. Adam Soltani, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Oklahoma, which sponsored the Muslim Day activities, said the questions were “stupid, Islamaphobic and hateful.“ We find those to be pretty bold words coming from a group that is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. A case that involved funding Hamas terrorist in the middle-east.
 
On Facebook, Soltani said the questions were produced by ACT! For America, an anti-Islam organization.
We have been unable to verify this claim.
 
“The question that comes to mind is does he do this to others?” Soltani told Buzzfeed News. “Does he ask questions to his Christian constituents? His Jewish constituents? If the answer is no, that’s discrimination. There’s no other way to call it.” We don’t seem to recall a Jewish day or a Christian day much less a Buddha day at the Capital. It would appear to us that the Muslim day is actually in violation of the Constitution as it sets out a specific religion for commemoration at the capital.
 
Mr. Bennett sent KFOR a copy of the questionnaire, which can be seen when you open the link. We should add that it does appear that the questionnaire was produced by Act For America.
 
Rep. Bennett released the following statement regarding the questionnaire:
 
For the record, I didn’t refuse to meet with any of them. I was already gone when they stopped by my office. I was on my way home when they visited the capitol.
 
That’s why I left the questionnaire with instructions to my assistant; if they wanted to visit with me about CAIR or Muslim Day to answer them, set an appointment with me, and bring the Quran, Shariah Law Book and Mohammed Sunna back with them when they come and we would sit down and discuss the facts in the questionnaire.
 
*CAIR knows that the legislature typically isn’t in session after noon on Thursdays (this early in the session), and most Reps. and Senators who do not live close are gone by noon. CAIR conveniently schedules their Muslim Day on Thursdays around noon every year. I don’t think this is coincidence.
 
All the questions on the sheet are questions I have already found the answer to in the Quran, Sunna and Shariah Law.
 
ANYONE can do 3rd grade research and find the same answers via Google. I used actual documents that Islamic Scholars have agreed on for my proof; Quran, Sunna of Mohammed, Shariah Law Book (Reliance of the Traveler.
 
The questionnaire was left for them to provoke their thought. If they weren’t aware of what Islam stands for they should know and research, then make a better informed decision on what they want to support or not. If they are aware of what Islam, Shariah, CAIR, Jihadist stand for and still support it then they are part of the problem.
 
Here is the answer to the question about them beating their wife, and it being permitted in Islam;
 
Quran
 
Quran (4:34) – “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.”  Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word beat, but it is the same on used in verse 8:12 and clearly means to strike.
 
Quran (38:44) – “And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath…” Allah telling Job to beat his wife (Tafsir).
 
Hadith and Sira
 
Sahih Bukhari (72:715) – A woman came to Muhammad and begged her to stop her husband from beating her. Her skin was bruised so badly that it is described as being “greener” than the green veil she was wearing. Muhammad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires.
Sahih Bukhari (72:715) – “Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women’” Muhammad’s own wife complained of the abuse that the women of her religion suffered relative to other women.
 
Sahih Muslim (4:2127) – Mohammed struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates, “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”
 
Sahih Muslim (9:3506) – Muhammad’s fathers-in-law (Abu Bakr and Umar) amused him by slapping his wives (Aisha and Hafsa) for annoying him. According to the Hadith, the prophet of Islam laughed upon hearing this.
 
Abu Dawud (2141) – “Iyas bin ‘Abd Allah bin Abi Dhubab reported the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens, but when ‘Umar came to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) and said: Women have become emboldened towards their husbands, he (the prophet) gave permission to beat them.” At first, Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives, but he rescinded this once it was reported that women were becoming emboldened toward their husbands. Beatings in a Muslim marriage are sometimes necessary to keep women in their place.
 
Abu Dawud (2142) – “The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.” The authenticity of this verse is characterized as daif (weak), however, a similar verse from Sunan Ibn Majah (3:9:1986) is said to be hasan (sufficient).
 
Abu Dawud (2126) – “A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: ‘I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet).’ The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: ‘She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her’” A Muslim thinks he is getting a virgin, then finds out that she is pregnant. Muhammad tells him to treat the woman as a sex slave and then flog her after she delivers the child.
 
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 969 – Requires that a married woman be “put in a separate room and beaten lightly” if she “acts in a sexual manner toward others.” According to the Hadith, this can be for an offense as petty as merely being alone with a man to whom she is not related.
 
Kash-shaf (the revealer) of al-Zamkhshari (Vol.1, p 525)-[Muhammed said] “Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it.”
 
Some contemporary Muslim apologist often squirm over this relatively straightforward verse from the Quran (4:34)-which gives men the right to beat their wives if they even “fear” of disloyalty or disobedience. This rhetorical aerobics inspired us to write a Separate article:
 
Wife Beating- Good Enough for Muhammad, Good Enough for You
 
(Islam teaches that to be a perfect Muslim you must follow Muhammad’s examples)
 
Others are not nearly as squeamish. Sheikh Yousef al- Qaradhawi, one of the most respected Muslim clerics in the world, once made the famous (and somewhat ridiculous statement) that “It is forbidden to beat the women, unless it is necessary.” He went on to say that “one may beat only to safeguard Islamic behavior,” leaving no doubt that wife- beating is a matter of religious sanction. (source)
Dr. Muzammil Saddiqi, the former president of ISNA (the Islamic Society of North America), a mainstream Muslim organization, says it is important that a wife “recognizes the authority of her husband in the house” and that he may use physical force if he is “sure it would improve the situation.” (source)
 
Sheikh Dr. Ahmad Muhammad Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the head of Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam’s most prestigious institution says that “light beatings” and “punching” are part of a program to “reform the wife” (source).
 
Dr. Jamal Badawi endorses corporal punishment as “another measure that may save the marriage” (source). He isn’t clear on how striking a woman will make her more inclined toward staying with her assailant, unless the implication is fear of more serious consequences if she leaves.
 
Egyptian cleric, Abd al-Rahman Mansour, said in a 2012 televised broadcast that, in addition to discouraging the wife from filing divorce, beatings would inspire the wife to “treat him with kindness and respect, and know that her husband has a higher status than her.” (source)
 
During Ramadan of 2010, another cleric named Sa’d Arafat actually said the woman is “honored” by the beating (source). No one else seemed terribly surprised or upset by this.
 
An undercover report from progressive Sweden in 2012 found that 60% of mosques there actually advised beaten women not to report the abuse to the police. These women were also told that they must submit to non-consensual ‘sex’ with their husbands. (source)
 
In the birthplace of Islam, about half of Saudi women are beaten at home. “Hands and sticks were found to be used mostly in beating women, following by men’s head cover and to a lesser extent, sharp objects.” (Source)
 
In 2016, the Council of Islamic Ideology proposed a bill-ironically named the Protection of Women against Violence Act- that actually included exceptions for “lightly beating” defiant wives. (source)
 
According to Islamic law, a husband may strike his wife for any one of the following four reasons:
 
_She does not attempt to make herself beautiful for him (ie. “let’s herself go”)
 
_She refuses to meet his sexual demands
 
_She leaves the house without his permission or for a “legitimate reason”
 
_She neglects her religious duties
 
Any of these are also sufficient grounds for divorce.
 
Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor. Tabari said that it means to “admonish them, but if the refuse to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you.” Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that “it is not a crime if it leads to death.” (source)
 
Muslim apologist sometimes say that Muhammad ordered that women not be harmed, but they are actually basing this on what he said before or during a battle, such as Bukhari (59:447), when Muhammad issued a command for all the men of Quraiza be killed and the women and children taken as slaves. (Having your husband murdered and being forced into sexual slavery apparently doesn’t qualify as “harm” under the Islamic model).
 
But, in fact, there are a number of cases in which Muhammad did have women killed in the most brutal fashion. One was Asma bint Marwan, a mother of five, who wrote a poem criticizing the Medinans for accepting Muhammad after he had ordered the murder of an elderly man. In this case, the prophet’s assassins literally pulled a sleeping infant from her breast and stabbed her to death.
 
After taking Mecca in 630, Muhammad also ordered the murder of a slave girl who had merely made up songs mocking him. The Hadith are rife with accounts of women planted in the ground on Muhammad’s command and pelted to death with stones for sexual immorality-yet the prophet of Islam actually encouraged his own men to rape women captured in battle (Abu Dawood 2150, Muslim 3433) and did not punish them for killing non-Muslim women (as Khalid ibn Walid did on several occasions-see Ibn Ishaq 838 and 856)
 
In summary, according to the Quran, Hadith and Islamic law, a woman may indeed have physical harm done to her if the circumstances warrant, with one such allowance being in the case of disobedience. This certainly does not mean that all Muslim men beat their wives only that Islam permits them to do so.
 
More importantly…people are missing the REAL ISSUE (Actual threat) here on Muslim Day, and that is the fact that CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) is a known and designated terrorist organization and they are freely roaming through our state capitol.
 
CAIR is NOT a civil rights organization. They are masquerading (sic) as a civil rights group to promote their agenda.
 
Here is the proof;
 
CAIR is HAMAS
 
The following is a small portion of the evidence which identifies the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) as a Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas and terrorist organization.
 
Summary
 
Among the massive amount of evidence entered into the US vs. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (hereafter “HLF”) trial-the largest Hamas and terrorism financing trial successfully prosecuted in U.S. history-is a volume of evidence which definitely identifies CAIR as an organization established by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s “Palestine Committee” which is Hamas in America. CAIR has received funds from other Hamas entities and organizations affiliated with Al Qaeda. In fact, a document retrieved from CAIR headquarters reveals internal discussions at CAIR to support Osama bin Laden.
 
While CAIR bills itself as a “Muslim civil rights” organization, the evidence does not support this and, in fact, demonstrates it is a Hamas entity. Hamas is a terrorist organization.
Specific Facts
 
1 In 1993, the leaders of the U.S. Palestine Committee, which is Hamas in the United States, met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The meeting was covered by the FBI via physical surveillance, microphones in meeting rooms, wiretaps on phones and other investigative techniques. An Action Memo from FBI Counterterrorism Assistant Director Dale Watson stated this was a “Meeting among senior leaders of Hamas, the HLFRD and the IAP.” The FBI’s analysis of the Philadelphia meeting entered as in the US vs HLF trial stated “All attendees of this meeting are Hamas members.” CAIR founders Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad were present at this meeting.
 
2 The U.S. government’s indictment of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) stated: “The purpose of this (1993 Philadelphia) meeting was to determine their course of action in support of Hamas’ opposition to the peace plan and to decide how to conceal their activities from scrutiny of the United States government.”
 
3 FBI recordings of the conversations by Hamas leaders at the Philadelphia meeting captured Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad discussing the creation of a public relations organization for Hamas which FBI investigators testified was CAIR, created in 1994 following the Philadelphia meeting.
 
4 CAIR was incorporated in 1994 by Nihad Awad, Omar Ahmad and Rafeeq Jaber, all of whom were leaders of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP), a now defunct Hamas organization in the U.S.
 
5 In 193 nd994,CAIR founder Omar Ahmad served as the National President for IAP (Hamas) and was Chairman of the Board for CAIR from 1994-2005.
 
6 Rafeeq Jaber served as the National President of IAP (Hamas) from 1996-98 and 1999-2005
 
7 Musa Abu Marzook, the Deputy Political Chief for Hamas and the leader of Hamas in the United States (Chairman of the U.S. Palestine Committee), was a member of the IAP Board of Directors.
 
8 CAIR founder Omar Ahmad was on the Executive Committee for the U.S. Palestine Committee (U.S. Hamas).
 
9 Because of the overwhelming evidence that CAIR is a Hamas entity, U.S. prosecutors identified CAIR as a member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee (Hamas), and as unindicted co-conspirators in the US vs HLF case-the largest terrorism financing and Hamas trial ever successfully prosecuted in U.S. history.
 
10 The Palestine Committee (Hamas) Meeting in 1994 list CAIR as the 4th organization operating under it (Hamas). This document was entered into evidence at the US v HLF trial.
 
11 Hamas is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) by the U.S. government and many governments around the world.
 
12 In the December 2007 government filing in the US v Sabri Benkhala appeal (Eastern District of Virginia) the government stated: “From its founding by the Muslim Brotherhood leaders, CAIR conspired with other affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood to support terrorists.”
 
13 In a document retrieved from CAIR’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. by one of its interns- now UTT Vice President Chris Gaubatz- CAIR openly discussed supporting Osama bin Laden. The document was titled “Proposed Muslim Platform for 2004” (dated 3/08/04) and stated, in part, “Attempt to understand Islamic movements in the area, and start supporting Islamic groups including Mr. bin Laden and his associates.”
 
14 In a 2004 FBI raid at the Annadale, Virginia residence of Ismail Elbarasse. A senior Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood leader, the archives of the U.S. MB were discovered. One of the documents found listed the leaders of the U.S. Palestine Committee (Hamas). On the list were the names of CAIR founders Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad (alias Omar Yeheya).
 
15 In the government filing rebuking CAIR’s motion to have its name removed from the unindicted co-conspirator list in the HLF case, U.S. prosecutors stated, “As of the date of this response, the Court has entered into evidence a wide array of testimonial and documentary evidence expressly linking CAIR and its founders to the HLF and its principals; the Islamic Association for Palestine and its principals; the Palestine Committee in the United States, headed by Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzook; and the greater Hamas-affiliated conspiracy described in the Government’s case-in-chief.”
 
16 In the government filing rebuking ISNA/NAIT’s motion to have their names removed from the unindicted co-conspirator list in the HLF case, U.S. prosecutors stated, “The U.S. Muslim Brotherhood created the U.S. Palestine Committee, which documents reflect was initially comprised of three organizations: the OLF (HLF), the IAP and the UASR. CAIR was later added to these organizations…the mandate of these organizations, per the International Muslim Brotherhood, was to support Hamas.”
 
17 In the ruling to leave CAIR on the unindicted co-conspirator list in the HLF case, Federal Judge Jorge Solis listed a portion of the overwhelming evidence against CAIR and wrote: “The Government has produced ample evidence to establish CAIR, ISNA and NAIT with the HLF, the Islamic Association of Palestine (“IAP”) and with Hamas.”
 
18 In a 3-0 ruling, an Appellate panel agreed to leave CAIR, ISNA and NAIT on the unindicted co-conspirator list in the HLF case.
 
19 The Holy Land Foundation was convicted of being a Hamas organization and its leaders were convicted of being Hamas leaders which funneled over $12 million to Hamas.
 
20 HLF provided CAIR with $5,000 of seed money when it was found and CAIR raised money for HLF.
 
21 FBI Assistant Director Steve Pomeranz stated: “By masquerading as a mainstream public affairs organization, CAIR has taken the lead in trying to mislead the public about the terrorist underpinnings of militant Islamic movements, in particular Hamas.”
 
22 In a February 2010 affidavit from an FBI Special Agent in the immigration proceedings for Hamas leader Nabil Sadoun Dallas, Texas, the affiant declared the U.S. Palestine Committee was affiliated with Hamas. He further identified four (4) Hamas organizations created by the Hamas in America: Holy Land Foundation, Islamic Association for Palestine, United Association for Studies and Research and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).
 
23 In a 2003 Senate Sub=Committee hearing on radical Islam, Senator Charles Schumer (NY) stated, “To make matters worse, the prominent members of the Council’s (CAIR’s) current leadership who you Mr. Chairman invited to the hearing today, they declined to testify, also have intimate connections with Hamas.
 
24 In a letter dated February 12, 2010 to U.S. Congresswoman Sue Myrick (NC) from assistant U.S. Attorney Ronald Weich, Mr. Weich wrote “Enclosed (is) evidence that was introduced in the trial (US v HLF) which demonstrated the relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders and the Palestine Committee. Evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestine Committee and Hamas.”
 
25 In June 2009, on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Frank Wolf (VA) gave a lengthy speech in which he laid out a great deal of the evidence against CAIR and its ties to Hamas. The transcript of this speech can be found at: https://web.archive.org/web/  20140922235833/http:/wolf.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/wolf-gives-major-floorspeech-on-fbis-cooperation-with-cair#.V_QwB7wrlfe (Note we were unable to get these links to open for us so we cannot verify their authenticity)
 
26 In a letter dated April 28, 2009 from the FBI’s Assistant Director, Office of Congressional Affairs, to U.S. Senator John Kyl (AZ), the FBI leader details why the FBI cut off all formal ties to CAIR and identifies it as an unindicted co-conspirator in the HLF trial because of its relationship with Hamas.
 
27 CAIR has received funds from overseas organizations WAMY (World Association of Muslim Youth) and IIRO (International Islamic Relief Organization), a subsidiary of the Muslim World League (MWL). Both WAMY and IIRO are Saudi-funded organizations whose U.S. offices were raided by the government because of their possible ties to Hamas and Al Qaeda.
 
28 In 1999, CAIR received $250,000 from a Saudi bank headed by the former director of the Muslim World League (MWL), identified by Osama bin Laden as a primary source of funds for Al Qaeda. Federal investigators raided MWL’s U.S. offices.
 
29 In a 2008 interview, the Deputy Supreme Guide of the International Muslim Brotherhood Muhammad Habib was asked about the Brotherhoods connection to CAIR: Interviewer “But back to CAIR, some people from the Muslim Brotherhood have denied having a connection with CAIR, Do they really represent you?” Habib: “Ehh, this is a sensitive subject, and it’s kind of problematic, especially after 9/11.” Interviewer: “For them to say there is a relationship between you two?” Habib: “Yes you can say that.”
 
30 CAIR has a long record of defending jihadis and jihadi organizations, and continues to publicly condemn all counterterrorism efforts of the U.S. government and local law enforcement. CAIR has never defended the United States in its war against jihadis. But why would they? They are Hamas.
 
It should be noted that the above information only represents a small fraction of the evidence demonstrating CAIR is a Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood entity. Hamas is a terrorist organization.
 
 
CAIR = Hamas. Hamas= Terrorist. CAIR =Terrorist
 
Citizens of Oklahoma should be asking the question of WHY is a terrorist organization allowed to freely operate in Our State Capitol, and freely in Oklahoma.
 
Rep. Bennett also made headlines in 2014 when he made anti-Islamic statements on social media and called Islam a “cancer in our nation.” We have provided the link here
 
Now we are going to introduce you to a word that those in the Muslim community will deny they use, and the main stream media fear to use because of political correctness. This is straight from the dictionary for all of you journalist out there so pay attention. The word is
 
Taqiyah or taqiya both spellings are considered correct. Word origin noun, (in in Shi’ite Islam) it is the practice of denying one’s religion, permissible when one is faced with persecution, especially by Sunnites: regarded as a means of protecting the religion.
 
What occurred at the State Capitol on Muslim Day was nothing more than a skillfully planned use of taqiyah. This was a publicity stunt pulled off by CAIR to make a state legislator who they dislike look bad. We thought it was pretty sorry of the main stream media to broadcast the Muslim side of the story and only print the Representatives rebuttal in their online site. Representative Bennett is owed an apology by the news media and by CAIR for trying to pull off a stunt like this at his expense.
 
Little did CAIR realize that there little publicity stunt would raise more questions than they wanted. We have a few questions that demand an answer by our legislature and our Governor.  Why do we have a Muslim Day at the Capitol? Why is no other religion recognized with a day at the capitol? Doesn’t recognizing the Muslims with their separate day at the capitol violate separation of church and state?
 
In conclusion the Muslims do not deserve any special treatment because of their religion. Unless the state is prepared to recognize every religion out there including Satanism with their own special day at the capitol, this must come to a stop immediately. The Quran directs observant Muslims to fight and kill non-believers something like 500 times and by way of contrast, the New Testament directs Christians to the same path how many times? Exactly Zero.
 
 
In summary, the Quran directs observant Muslims to fight and kill non-believers something like 500 times, and by way of contrast, the New Testament directs Christians to the same path how many times?
Exactly zero
 
 
 
nse Fund