The Urban Dharma Newsletter - July 18, 2006
In This Issue: Buddhism and Yoga
1. Making A Difference - 7/2006 - 41min - MP3 - 9.4 MB
2. Buddhism and Yoga
3. Yoga and Buddhism - Sharon Gannon
4. Four experts on combining yoga and Buddhism - by Stephen Cope
5. Yoga and Buddhism - by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri)
1. Making A Difference - 7/2006 - 41min - MP3 - 9.4 MB
My interview with Ericka Bryant the owner of True Yoga in Thousand Oaks, California. She talks about how she came to yoga, religion and spirituality, a 16 day yoga retreat she just returned from and how to start a yoga practice. You can find me at True Yoga the 1st and 3rd Saturday of each month, talking about Buddhism and meditation. - Peace... Kusala
2. Buddhism and Yoga
The root word buddh means to wake up, to know, to understand; and he or she who wakes up and understands is called a Buddha. It is as simple as that. The capacity to wake up, to understand, and to love is called Buddha nature. When Buddhists say "I take refuge in the Buddha in me," they are expressing trust in their own capacity of understanding, of becoming awake... "in me" makes it very clear that you yourself are the Buddha.
-Being Peace, Thich Nhat Hanh
A buddha is the butterfly that finally emerges from the cocoon of the human life-form. Buddha is not just one perfected person who lived once in history. You and I will become buddhas. At least we should experiment in that direction to see what happens. We are actually incredibly close to a decisive triumph over suffering. The supreme value we give to freedom comes from our sense that the true reality is total freedom, and our knowledge of that is the doorway to our highest destiny, our supreme fulfillment...
What Jews, Christians, Muslims, and Hindus call "God" is a force of reality much like the infinite ocean-body of living joy that great Buddhist meditators experience. When a believer asserts unshakable faith in the face of the worst experience or apparent reality, she or he is reaching for connection to the deepest awareness of infinite living energy. Enlightened people do not see this boundlessness as something other than themselves. They experience themselves as one with all gods and all other beings.
- Inner Revolution, Robert Thurman
The primary exercise, or yoga, is a way to begin to transform the self-preoccupation that causes chronic suffering into the insightful, gradual opening and letting go of the self...
- Inner Revolution, Robert Thurman
The Buddha's teaching has sometimes been looked upon as a pragmatic version of Yoga...The Buddha emphasized practical discipline? his noble eightfold path to liberation... The yogic nature of the Buddha's path is obvious from the use of such techniques as postures (asana) and breath control (pranayama). The contribution of Buddhism to the development of the Yoga tradition has been considerable, just as the authorities of Yoga have contributed greatly to the unfolding of the Buddhist teachings.
-The Shambala Encyclopedia of Yoga
If we are not happy, if we are not peaceful, we can not share peace and happiness with others, even those we love, those who live under the same roof. If we are peaceful, if we are happy, we can smile and blossom like a flower, and everyone in our family, our entire society, will benefit from our peace... Smiling means that we are ourselves, that we have sovereignty over ourselves, that we are not drowned into forgetfulness. This kind of smile can be seen on the faces of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas.
-Being Peace, Thich Nhat Hanh
This capacity of waking up, of being aware of what is going on in your feelings, in your body, in your perceptions, in the world, is called buddha nature, the capacity of uderstanding and loving... Do not maintain anger or hatred. As soon as anger and hatred arise, practice the meditation on compassion in order to deeply understand the persons who have caused anger and hatred. Learn to look at other beings with the eyes of compassion...
-Being Peace, Thich Nhat Hanh
It is impossible to overemphasize the enhancement of life brought about by the conception of this soul of enlightenment. It is a conscious act of making one's own life purposeful and, by experiencing unconditional love and compassion, of easing the suffering of others everywhere. From the moment one attains this grand conception, one has an inexhaustible well of hope and optimism. One must become open to the prospect of boundless future existences. Then the horizon is vast and open-ended enough that the bodhisattva does not feel excessive pressure and the messianic orientation indeed becomes reasonable, natural, and even immediately rewarding. This is the yoga of the greatest contentment, wherein we turn away from the self to find the doorway to happiness and the most powerful form of inner revolution.
-Inner Revolution, Robert Thurman
This is the messianic drive of the bodhisattva, the spirit of love and compassion called the enlightening soul. It is not merely the wish that all be well with all beings - it is the determination that you yourself will assume responsibility for others. Acting on the insight that yourself and others actually are one single body of life and that your sense of having a self apart is a tragic illusion, you joyfully wish to give yourself away totally, on every level, to enrich the lives of all. You systematically resolve to attain buddhahood, which is the ultimate form of evolution, the state from which you really can accomplish the benefit of living beings.
-Inner Revolution, Robert Thurman
3. Yoga and Buddhism - Sharon Gannon
By looking for similarities between yoga and Buddhism, rather than differences, we have an opportunity to further expand our understanding of the quest for enlightenment. The search for relationships within related practices develops intuitive skills and insightful wisdom.
A mind that can focus and become concentrated is a better tool for enlightenment than a mind easily distracted and fragmented.
In contemplating the relationship of yoga and Buddhism, we must not forget that the Buddha was Indian, was well-versed in Vedantic philosophy, was a practitioner of yoga, and sought an experiential understanding of the philosophy. The Buddha was such a devoted and serious practitioner of the yogic arts that he attained the fruits of the practice: enlightenment.
The heart of the Buddha's teachings lies in the Four Noble Truths, expounded in his very first sermon following his enlightenment. The first noble truth proclaimed by the Buddha is Dukka: Life is suffering and suffering is a reality. The second truth, Samudaya, is that the cause of this suffering originates in our own minds. The third noble truth, Nirodha, offers hope: liberation and freedom from suffering is possible. The fourth noble truth, Magga, gives one the method to attain liberation, known to Buddhists as the path of the "Middle Way."
Both Buddhism and Yogic schools of thought recognize that enlightenment arises when there is freedom from the dualistic mindset. Krishna teaches in the Bhagavad-Gita the importance of equanimity of mind.
Delusion arises from the duality of attraction and aversion, O Bharati; every creature is deluded by these from birth. (7:27).
The compassionate Buddha was noted for saying, "When we don't have what we want, we are unhappy; when we do get what we don't want, we are unhappy. Freedom comes when we are free from our wants, our preferences."
Patanjali's definition of yoga is Yogash Citta Vritti Nirodha (1:2), which means when you cease to identify with the fluctuations of mind, then there is yoga, identity with Self, which is Samadhi, happiness, bliss, and ecstasy.
The yogic text Astavakra Samhita states: One who thinks he is free is free, one who thinks he is bound is bound, as we think so we become. When one identifies with that which is eternal, one eventually becomes eternal.
"If you seek enlightenment, go to the root cause. Nothing exists without a cause. The root cause of enlightenment is compassion." - H.H. XIV Dalai Lama
Compassion is the core teaching of Buddhism and yoga.
Patanjali's Yoga Sutra states that the practice of ahimsa (non-harming of others) will result in good karma, which eventually will result in the experience of happiness and peace.
Chapter 2:35 states, Ahimsa Pratisthayam Tat Samnidhau Vaira Tyagah (to the one who causes no suffering to others, no suffering will be caused to him.)
Every thought, word, and deed that we do will come back to us; knowing this, be kind and compassionate toward all other beings.
Buddhism and yoga are aimed toward enlightenment. What is realized in the enlightened state is the absolute Oneness of Being. Knowing this, then "otherness" is the obstacle to enlightenment, and compassion is the cure. Compassion is the ability to see yourself in others, (all others), to see so deeply and clearly that otherness disappears. When otherness disappears, Oneness remains. In Buddhist terms, this is described as emptiness of form.
Buddhism as well as yoga recognizes that there is suffering, and that freedom from suffering is possible. These ancient teachings hold that compassion is a vehicle for liberation. Meditation is a yogic practice used by Buddhists and yogis alike to go beyond the fluctuations of the mind (the dualistic thought process), to realize the Oneness of Being. Buddhists may call it emptiness. Yogis may call it the absolute self. Shakespeare said, "That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
4. Four experts on combining yoga and Buddhism - by Stephen Cope This article originally appeared in the Shambhala Sun magazine, July, 2003.
Stephen Cope, psychotherapist and author of Yoga and the Quest for the True Self, started sitting meditation every evening at the Boston Dharmadhatu around the corner from his house when he was in graduate school. His life took a different turn, though, when he discovered Kripalu yoga. He is now senior scholar-in-residence at the Kripalu Center for Yoga and Health in West Stockbridge, Massachusetts.
People say that yoga is a preparation for meditation, but I’ve never met anyone who actually taught it that way.
I do. I had a lot of formal training in meditation by the time I came to yoga, and I realized that yoga was a shortcut: slow, deliberate movement is concentration practice. It’s not unlike shamatha, but in the case of yoga, the body becomes the object of meditation. Then increasingly subtle aspects of the body become the object of concentration. Of course, the more subtle the object, the more subtle the mind becomes. I instantly recognized that I was dealing with meditation.
How does that translate into the actual physical practice?
It means there is more focus on the internal experience. There are a lot of traditions that have a strong focus on alignment and details, on the more external aspects of the postures. This form of yoga is more interested in the internal, concentrated mental states that are created by movement and posture.
To what end?
Very much the same end as Buddhism. We practice asana in the context of the classical eight-limb path that was laid out by Patanjali in the second century CE The ends are to attenuate suffering and to see reality clearly—very much the same thing that the Buddha was interested in.
To attenuate your own suffering, or the suffering of others?
Ah! In the classical yoga tradition, there does not seem to exist the same bodhisattva archetype that they work with in the Mahayana tradition. It is more about the attenuation of the afflicted emotions—the kleshas. That's where the real core of the similarity is. The whole path is about the attenuation of the afflictions that create hatred and delusion.
Do you see yourself as a Buddhist teacher?
I see myself as a yoga teacher who is deeply steeped in Buddhism. One thing that's very interesting is that, in the Buddhist tradition, practice depends on the cultivation of both concentrated mind states and investigative mind states, or insight. In the yoga tradition, very few people teach the insight series. So a lot of American yoga students have to learn that part of practice from Buddhists, as I did.
What do you mean by "insight"?
Seeing the three marks of existence—suffering, impermanence and egolessness. In the classical yoga tradition, final liberation depends on seeing that everything in the created world arises and passes away, moment to moment, and everything in the created world is empty of self. And also there’s the reality of suffering. Those three marks of existence are very much the same in both systems, except that the final insight in the yogic series is to see that pure awareness abides behind the whole shower of phenomena.
Most of the yoga classes I've taken have been about getting in shape.
No kidding! Well, that’s the first step. A lot of beginning yoga focuses on alignment and strength—learning how to inhabit your body. I think you’ll find that in almost all the traditions, the more advanced stages are about penetrating the subtle body.
Do you do sitting meditation yourself?
I do. I sit every day. Our whole community sits together every day. Everything stops. Employees are paid to sit. We usually combine yoga with sitting. In one practice period every day, we do an-hour-and-a-half of postures and then a deep relaxation and then a half-hour of sitting.
Does the yoga practice change the meditation practice?
Very much. It entrains people into a very highly concentrated state. When we all sit down to meditate at the end of an-hour-and-a-half of postures, you can feel the samadhi—the concentration—in the room. It is very deep from the beginning; it is like a wonderful bath.
Shosan Victoria Austin was ordained as a Zen priest in 1982, and received dharma transmission in 1999. She began to study yoga after a near-death experience pushed her into practicing zazen with "such fervor," she says, "that I almost burned out my nervous system." Having trained with senior Iyengar yoga teachers in the United States and India, she now teaches yoga to meditation practitioners across the country. She currently serves as president of the San Francisco Zen Center.
Do you actually integrate Buddhism with hatha yoga?
I try to be true to the lineage I'm teaching. When I teach an asana class, it's an asana class. When I teach zazen, I teach according to Suzuki Roshi's lineage. Some people think the disciplines can be blended, but that's not so. If I do that, I run the risk of losing what makes each lineage a teaching. But they're both yogic practices. Zen is a yogic school of Buddhist meditation: it has to do with the development of effort, which is exactly what hatha yoga has to do with.
The development of effort?
How to make a balanced and constructive effort that actually helps you. Yoga practice taught me right effort. But to experience the fruits of practice I had to actually practice the practice, not practice according to my own ideas.
Do you think there are a lot of dharma practitioners for whom yoga is essential?
Yes, I do. People who have obstacles in meditation practice—which is everybody—need some way through them.
Are you talking about physical, mental or emotional obstacles?
They are not split up that way. Obstacles are obstacles. I don't think there is such a thing as a purely physical obstacle.
Let's say a person experiences knee pain while sitting. We usually think that is just a physical obstacle, right? Actually, it isn't. Is the person sitting in a position that respects the way hips and ankles bend? This is physical and psychological. Also, does the person clench their body through the "fight or flight" response while sitting? This is physical, and it's also physiological and emotional. A position that truly respects the way their hips and ankles bend is certainly physical. But it's also psychological, energetic and ethical.
Because of the experience the practitioner is having while sitting?
Right. People want meditation practice to be restful, and in a certain sense it is, because there are not so many outside stimuli. But meditation experience gets personal very fast. Any obstacle will loom extremely large in the person's consciousness when he or she sits. All the ways the person deals with anger, fear, desire, aversion and, thus, ego, will come into play. Can we let go of that and work with the knee as it is? So working with the knee pain transforms the practitioner's experience of pain into an education in integrated effort.
How would asana practice help a person work through their obstacles?
Asana practice puts the person, knee and all, into situations in which they can understand the activity of their body—physically, physiologically, psychologically and in relation to their spiritual intention.
In Buddhist practice there are steps and stages which Zen teachers don't often talk about: there is the path of preparation and accumulation, and then there is the path of insight. Many people see asana practice as part of accumulating or developing the equipment with which to sit. But you can see asana as stabilization, and you can experience asana as insight. Patanjali, the codifier of yoga, said, "Asana is a steady, comfortable pose." And Suzuki Roshi, the founder of my community, said, "Just to sit with perfect attention on posture and breathing and great, pure effort, is zazen." Instead of drowning in our obstacles, let's hear these words.
So the two practices fit together.
Yes. The process of studying oneself through asana is the process of understanding the obstacles of action—how these have developed over time into habits. These habits seem to be written into the cells and the shape of the body, into how we act and react. We need to trace them back to the source.
In meditation, the same process occurs with the subtle afflictions. Whatever comes up is what we study. We apply ourselves in a balanced, constructive, wholesome way, until finally we just sit in silence. In that state, we experience no separation between the self and the world. There isn't any dualistic assumption. Without the assumption, we respond rather than react. Without a reaction, we are free.
The first yoga teacher Richard Freeman ever met was a Zen Buddhist at the Chicago Zen Center in 1968. “He taught only one posture,” Freeman says, “sitting zazen. But that was yoga.” Since then, Freeman has spent nearly nine years in Asia studying various traditions which he incorporates into the ashtanga practice taught to him by his principle teacher, K. Pattabhi Jois. Freeman’s background includes Zen and Vipassana meditation, Bhakti, traditional hatha and Iyengar yogas, and Sufism. He lives in Boulder, Colorado where he is the director of the Yoga Workshop.
How are yoga and Buddhism similar?
If you look at something like the Yoga Sutra, you can see the Buddhism woven into it. A lot of the terminology is Mahayana terminology. The schools are similar enough, but their cultures are different—so they either infuriate or inspire one another.
The Indian yoga that is popular now in the States is not really representative of yoga. Most yogis in India will do a couple of postures, get that alignment and quit when they’re twenty-five because they hurt their necks doing it.
Then what do they do?
Then they do their meditation and pranayama. If you go all over India, that’s mostly what you find. In terms of the brilliant practice of asanas that you find in North America, that’s just one thread coming through Krishnmacharya and his students.
You teach ashtanga mainly because ...
It’s just what I wound up doing! The term “ashtanga” isn’t just referring to the vigorous methodology of Pattabhi Jois; it refers to the classical eight limbs, not unlike the eightfold path of the Buddha. Within the yoga schools, ashtanga implies a type of practice that is oriented towards insight for the purpose of liberation—not the cultivation of anything else.
Is it true that people are turning to Buddhism in order to gain insight into the three marks of existence, because those teachings aren’t available through the study of yoga.
People are turning to Buddhism for that because of the dubious quality of the instruction that is available. This is part of the social phenomenon of yoga. So many people have gone to India for teacher training, and have gotten a watered-down version for mass consumption. It’s easy and profitable.
Most of the yogic scriptures start out talking about suffering, impermanence and the basic problem of ignorance. If you were from another planet, you would say that yoga’s the same as Buddhism.
The thing with Indian yogis—and this is not universally true but it is true with some—they’re very reluctant to really teach stuff that is chewy and heavy. They have this cultural snobbery, particularly if they’re Brahmins. They figure that these students can't understand it anyway—maybe they will in their next life. Or maybe if they’re good boys and girls, they will in this life.
One of the traditional Hindu teachings is that most people aren’t really interested in the truth. So you give them some religious form that will do them good, and you keep them in their place. Then, at a certain point, they’ll inquire.
So there’s not the urgency for Indian yogis to save all beings. Eventually they want to save all beings. But they figure they have lots of time.
If you look at what’s happening in Western yoga, people are pretty much caught up in the idea of being super-healthy and full of bliss, grasping at pleasurable states of consciousness.
Does that disturb you, knowing what you know?
Oh yeah. So this is the way my contemplation usually goes: at least they’re a little bit interested in the subject. At least they’re getting started in it. If their teachers have some integrity, people will start learning more.
People come to yoga for all kinds of reasons. Mostly they want something. But the same could be said of Buddhism: people want peace of mind or something. Their desire still tends to be egocentric. But if they’ve come to a good source, they’ll start to get more than they asked for, more than they bargained for. And that’s the hope with this huge wave of popularity of yoga—that there’ll be a significant percentage of people who really take to it and really inquire into its roots. I remain optimistic.
Seven years ago Jill Satterfield met Tsoknyi Rinpoche, the son of renowned Dzogchen master Tulku Urgyen. After getting to know her as his student, Tsokyni Rinpoche asked Satterfield to be his yoga teacher. Since then she’s been teaching at his North American retreats. She lives and works in New York City.
How does yoga practice differ from Buddhist practice, in your experience?
In the Vajrayana, we don’t view the body and mind as being separate entities the way some hatha yogis do. It is the same. In order to introduce this to someone who is practicing hatha yoga, we need to start by introducing the subtle body: the mind lives in the body through the energetic system—the subtle body—and that affects the gross body. It is not the other way around. That is a huge difference in attitude and view.
Can you explain what the gross and subtle bodies are?
The consciousness of the mind is reflected in the energetic body. Where your mind goes is where your energy flows. Where your energy is blocked is where your consciousness does not reside yet. In order to know where your mind lives or does not live in your body and how that is manifested, you need to start to understand your energy. The simplest way to begin to understand how energy works in the body is to begin to picture the central channel—the sushumna, in Sanskrit, or the uma, in Tibetan. This is pretty easy to introduce to hatha yogis: they’re used to feeling some interesting natural bliss feelings when their practice gets going.
How is the central channel related to bliss?
According to the Tibetans, the central channel is where the bliss runs. Picture a river or a beam of light that begins at the perineum and goes straight up through the body—through the throat, through the skull to the crown of the head. If you picture it as water, you can feel where it flows and where it is dammed up or blocked. If you picture it as a beam of light, you can picture where it is light and where it is dark. Once you start to understand where it’s flowing and where it isn’t, then you start to understand energetically where there are knots and contractions. I say to people, “Is the place where you feel tight the same place that’s dark or blocked?,” and they always say, "Yes!"
All tightness in the gross body, unless it is an injury, emanates from the central channel. You’ll never fix something that’s tight in your outer body or gross body without addressing the central channel or the consciousness within. It’ll just be a quick fix, a Band-Aid. So the investigation is, "What is that darkness containing that I need to know about? What does that block mean?" It’s not necessarily that you need to go back to when you were two and say, "Oh, my teacher yelled at me so I tightened up.” It’s more that you’re taking time to look and be there.
Once you can stay there with those dark parts of your body, of your self, and are O.K. with them, then compassion blooms like a flower. Bodhicitta starts to rise. Once you start to feel that, then you can start to give to others because you are accepting who you are. I think what we’re trying to do in both this kind of yoga practice and in Buddhist practice is to be more natural. That isn’t easy.
To be a natural human being, to find our natural state, to uncover and uncover and uncover until we see our pure buddhanature. That takes practice and time and courage.
5. Yoga and Buddhism - by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri)
Yoga and Buddhism are sister traditions which evolved in the same spiritual culture of ancient India. They use many of the same terms and follow many of the same principles and practices. For this reason it is not surprising that many of us born in the West, particularly after an initial exposure, are apt to regard Yoga and Buddhism as more or less the same. The differences that have existed between the two systems historically are less obvious to us than their commonalities. Those who study Buddhism may find so much similarity in Yoga that they will see a strong Buddhist influence on Yoga. Those who study Yoga may find so much similarity in Buddhism that they will see a strong yogic influence on Buddhism.
However the tendency to find commonality between these two great spiritual traditions is not limited to the West. Swami Vivekananda, the first great figure to bring Yoga to the West, examined the Buddhist Mahayana scriptures (Sutras) and found much similarity between their key teachings and those of Vedanta. In recent years with the influx of Tibetan refugees, including the Dalai Lama, into India since the Chinese occupation of Tibet there has been a new dialogue between the two traditions that is bringing about greater respect between them. Tibetan Buddhists often appear at Hindu religious gatherings and partake in all manner of discussions.
Nor is the attempt to connect the two traditions limited to modern times. Various synthetic Hindu-Buddhist teachings have existed through history. Buddha himself was born a Hindu and some scholars have argued that Buddhism as a religion apart from Hinduism did not arise until long after the Buddha had passed away. A Shiva-Buddha teaching existed in Indonesia in medieval times, and for many Tantric Yogis it is difficult to tell whether they were Hindus or Buddhists. Buddha became accepted as an avatar of Vishnu during the period while Buddhism was still flourishing in India, and most Hindus still consider that we live in the age of the Buddha-avatar. Most Hindus accept Buddha, even if they do not accept all Buddhist teachings.
However such synthetic trends did not exclude disagreements and debates between the two traditions, which were quite common historically. Nor did they ever succeed in fully uniting them. Their traditions and lineages remain separate to the present day. Generally the Hindu Yoga tradition sought to absorb Buddhism into itself by reinterpreting Buddha in a more Hindu light. Buddhism however strove to maintain its separate identity. Most Hindu and Buddhist teachers, including those of the Yoga school of Hinduism, found it necessary to discriminate their doctrines, particularly on subtle levels of practice and insight. Hence while we can honor the connections between these two systems, we cannot overlook their differences either.
The Yoga Tradition
By Yoga here we mean primarily the classical Yoga system as set forth by Patanjali in the Yoga Sutras. Patanjali taught an eightfold (ashtanga) system of Yoga emphasizing an integral spiritual development including ethical disciplines (Yama and Niyama), postures (Asana), breathing exercises (Pranayama), control of the senses (Pratyahara), concentration (Dharana), meditation (Dhyana) and absorption (Samadhi). This constitutes a complete and integral system of spiritual training.
However classical Yoga was part of the greater Hindu and Vedic tradition. Patanjali was not the inventor of Yoga, as many people in the West are inclined to believe, but only a compiler of the teaching at a later period. Yogic teachings covering all aspects of Patanjali Yoga are common in pre-Patanjali literature of the Puranas, Mahabharata and Upanishads, where the name Patanjali has yet to occur. The originator of the Yoga system is said to be Hiranyagarbha, who symbolizes the creative and evolutionary force in the universe, and is a form of the Vedic Sun God.
Yoga can be traced back to the Rig Veda itself, the oldest Hindu text which speaks about yoking our mind and insight to the Sun of Truth. Great teachers of early Yoga include the names of many famous Vedic sages like Vasishta, Yajnavalkya, and Jaigishavya. The greatest of the Yogis is always said to be Lord Krishna himself, whose Bhagavad Gita itself is called a Yoga Shastra or authoritative work on Yoga. Among Hindu deities it is Shiva who is the greatest of the Yogis or lord of Yoga, Yogeshvara. Hence a comparison of classical Yoga and Buddhism brings the greater issue of a comparison between Buddhist and Hindu teachings generally.
Unfortunately some misinformed people in the West have claimed that Yoga is not Hindu but is an independent or more universal tradition. They point out that the term Hindu does not appear in the Yoga Sutras, nor does the Yoga Sutra deal with the basic practices of Hinduism. Such readings are superficial. The Yoga Sutras abounds with technical terms of Hindu and Vedic philosophy, which its traditional commentaries and related literature explain in great detail. Another great early Yogic text, the Brihatyogi Yajnavalkya Smriti, describes Vedic mantras and practices along with Yogic practices of asana and pranayama. The same is true of the Yoga Upanishads. Those who try to study Yoga Sutras in isolation are bound to make mistakes. The Yoga Sutras, after all, is a Sutra work. Sutras are short statements, often incomplete sentences, that without any commentary often do not make sense or can be taken in a number of ways.
Other people in the West including several Yoga teachers state that Yoga is not a religion. This can also be misleading. Yoga is not part of any religious dogma proclaiming that there is only one God, church or savior, nor have the great Yoga teachers from India insisted that their students become Hindus, but Yoga is still a system from the Hindu religion. It clearly does deal with the nature of the soul, God and immortality, which are the main topics of religion throughout the world. Its main concern is religious and certainly not merely exercise or health.
Classical Yoga is one of the six schools of Vedic philosophy (sad darsanas) which accept the authority of the Vedas. Yoga is coupled with another of these six schools, the Samkhya system, which sets forth the cosmic principles (tattvas) that the Yogi seeks to realized. Nyaya and Vaisheshika, Purva Mimamsa and Uttara Mimamsa (also called Vedanta) are the remaining schools, set off in groups of two. Yoga is also closely aligned with Vedanta. Most of the great teachers who brought Yoga to the modern world, like Swami Vivekananda, Paramahansa Yogananda, Sri Aurobindo, and Swami Shivananda, were Vedantins.
These six Vedic systems were generally studied together. All adapted to some degree the methods and practices of Yoga. While we can find philosophical arguments and disputes between them, they all aim at unfolding the truth of the Vedas and differ mainly in details or levels of approach. All quote from Vedic texts, including the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and Puranas for deriving their authority.
Some Western scholars call these "the six schools of Indian philosophy." This is a mistake. These schools only represent Vedic systems, not the non-Vedic of which they are several. In addition they only represent Vedic based philosophies of the classical era. There were many other Vedic and Hindu philosophical systems of later times.
The Buddhist schools, of which there are four in classical Indian philosophy, though they shared many ideas and with Vedic spirituality, like karma and rebirth, did not accept the authority of the Vedas and rejected a number of key Vedic principles. All Buddhist schools employ meditation but some add more specific yogic practices, like Pranayama and Mantra. Such systems may be called Buddhist Yoga by modern writers. However, Yoga as a term in lacking in early Buddhist texts, particularly of the Theravadin type, and becomes prominent mainly in the Buddhist Tantric tradition that developed later, particularly as practiced in Tibet. Some Buddhists regard that Buddha was a great Yogi, particularly relative to the occult and psychic powers he was supposed to possess.
Forms of Buddhism
Buddhism has basically two varieties, as well as many subvarieties. The northern, Mahayana or "great vehicle" tradition prevails in Tibet, China and Japan and adjacent countries. This is the type of Buddhism that is most known and followed by the largest number of people in the world. It includes Chan, Zen, Buddhist Tantra, Vajrayana, and Dzog Chen. The southern, Theravadin, prevails in the south of Asia, Sri Lanka, Burma and Thailand. Vipassana is the most commonly known practice of Theravada Buddhism. Generally the Theravadin form is considered to be the older of the two forms of Buddhism. However, most Indian Buddhism, including the Sanskrit Buddhist Sutras, is of the Mahayana branch and has probably been best preserved in Tibet, where it has undergone a further development into Vajrayana.
There are some disagreements between these two main Buddhist lines. The Mahayana tradition calls the Theravadin tradition, the Hinayana, or "lesser vehicle." Many Theravadins consider that types of Mahayana Buddhism, particularly the Tibetan, are not truly Buddhist because they have mixed Buddhism with indigenous religious practices.
The Mahayana tradition, particularly in its Tantric forms, uses breathing exercises, mantras, visualizations and deities much like the Yoga tradition. The Theravadin tradition has less in common with Yoga, though it does use similar meditation and concentration methods. It generally rejects devotional worship and the use of deities such as occurs in Yogic paths. For example, Vipassana teachers have often criticized the use of mantra, which is common not only in Hindu Yogic traditions but in the Mahayana Buddhist teachings. In fact it could be argued that Tibetan Buddhism, with its mantras, deities and yogic teachings, is closer to Hinduism in its teachings than to such Buddhist schools.
Buddhism grew up in a cultural base of Hinduism. For this reason Indian and Tibetan Buddhism have included Ayurvedic medicine, Hindu astrology, Sanskrit, the same rules of iconography and the same forms of temple worship, and other common factors. A number of Hindu Gods and Goddesses, like Ganesh and Sarasvati, appear in the Buddhist tradition. Some figures like the Goddess Tara appear in both. Yet as Buddhism moved to other countries many of these connections were either lost or their basis forgotten.
Nepal has remained as one region of the Indian subcontinent in which both these religions have continued, though Nepal has a Hindu majority, a Hindu king and is officially a Hindu state. In this regard Nepalese Hindus and Buddhist respect one another but seldom combine the teachings of these two different religions by way of their actual practices. They tend to follow one tradition or the other but seldom both.
Yoga and Meditation
Today Yoga is most known for its asana tradition or yogic postures, which are the most popular, visible and outward form of the system. Buddhism is known as a tradition of meditation, as in the more popular forms of Buddhist meditation like Zen and Vipassana. This is rather strange because Yoga traditionally defines itself as meditation, or calming the disturbances of the mind, not as asana, which is taught merely as an aid to meditation. In the Yoga Sutras, the classical text on Yoga, of which there are two hundred Sutras only three deal with asana, while the great majority deal with meditation, its theory and results. In the West we hear people talk of "Yoga and meditation," yoga meaning asana or some other outer practice like pranayama. If one states this in India, one hears "Yoga and meditation, are they two?"
Unfortunately many people who have studied Yoga in the West have learned only the asana or posture side of the teaching, not the meditation side. Some of them may therefore look to Buddhist teachings, like Zen or Vipassana, for meditation practices, not realizing that there are yogic and Vedantic forms of meditation which are traditionally not only part of the yogic system, but its core teaching! The cause for this often resides with Yoga teachers who have not studied the meditation side of their own tradition. Some have not been taught it as purely asana-oriented teachers have become more popular, no doubt owing to their appeal to the physically oriented Western mind.
There is nothing necessarily wrong with doing Yogic asanas and Buddhist meditation but one who is claiming to be a Yoga teacher and yet does not know the Yogic meditation tradition cannot claim to be a real Yoga teacher. We could compare them with someone who practices a Buddhist physical exercise system, like Buddhist martial arts, but on top of this does a non-Buddhist meditation system, and still claims to be a teacher of Buddhism! The real Yoga tradition has aimed at producing meditation masters, not merely beautifully flexible bodies. Mostof the Yoga System of Patanjali is concerned with the science of meditation (sanyama) as concentration, meditation and Samadhi (Dharana, Dhyana, Samadhi). In fact in the beginning of the Yoga Sutras Yoga is defined as Samadhi or spiritual absorption.
Yoga and its related Vedantic systems includes numerous types of meditation both with form and without. These include pranayama techniques like So'ham Pranayama or the various types of Kriya Yoga (like those taught by Yogananda), meditation on deities of all types and various devotional approaches, every sort of mantra from simple bija mantras like Om to long extended mantras like Gayatri, the use of yantras and other geometrical devises, diverse concentration methods, passive meditation approaches and active approaches like the Self-inquiry taught by Ramana Maharshi. It is a rich meditation tradition of which the rich asana tradition is merely an aspect.
Philosophical Differences Between Hinduism and Buddhism
Various Hindu-Buddhist philosophical debates have occurred through time. There are Buddhist refutations of the different schools of Hindu philosophy, including Yoga and Vedanta, and a rejection of Hindu deities like Shiva and Krishna. There are similar Yoga-Vedantic refutations of the different schools of Buddhist philosophy, including the rejection of the omniscience of Buddha, criticism of the Buddhist view of the mind, and so on.
Buddhist scriptures both Mahayana and Theravadin contain refutations of the Atman, Brahman, Ishvara, and the key tenets of Yoga and Vedanta, which are regarded as false doctrines. Note the Lankavatara Sutra, which is very typical in this regard. Refutation of Buddhist teachings does not occur in Hindu scriptures, which are largely pre-Buddhist but are common in the later literature. Many Vedantic, Sankhya and Yoga texts contain refutations of Buddhist doctrines, particularly of the four classical schools of Buddhist philosophy, which are similarly regarded as untrue. Such criticism of Buddhist teachings occur in the Yoga Sutra itself and are common in Advaita or non-dualistic Vedanta.
Such critiques can be found among the works of the greatest Hindu and Buddhist sages like Shankara of the Hindus, and Nagarjuna and Aryadeva of the Buddhists. Relative to Yoga and Buddhism one of the most interesting interactions was between Ishvara Krishna (not Krishna of the Bhagavad Gita) and the Buddhist guru of Vasubandhu, the founder of the Vijnanavada school. The debate was won by Ishvara Krishna and the record of his arguments, the Sankhya Karika was produced, which has become the main text on Samkhya. Vijnanavada, also called Yogachara, is the closest Buddhist school to classical Yoga, but curiously was the Buddhist system most in conflict with it in philosophical debates.
There have been similar, but more limited debates within each tradition, with Advaita Vedanta critiques of other Hindu traditions like Sankhya-Yoga, or Buddhist Madhyamika critiques of Buddhist Vijnanavada and other Buddhist traditions. The Indian tradition cherished debate as a means of finding truth and did not simply aim at superficial intellectual agreements. This tradition of free and open debate is alive not only in India but in Tibet. The Indian tradition never required intellectual uniformity but honored diversity.
How Yoga and Buddhism Compare
Yoga and Buddhism are both meditation traditions devised to help us transcend karma and rebirth and realize the truth of consciousness. They see the suffering and impermanence inherent in all birth, whether it is animal, human or god, and seek to alleviate it through developing a higher awareness. Both emphasize the need to dissolve the ego, the sense of the me and the mine, and return to the original reality that is not limited by the separate self. Both traditions emphasize enlightenment or inner illumination to be realized through meditation.
Both systems recognize dharma, the principle of truth or natural law, as the basic law of the universe we must come to understand. Such dharmas are the law of karma and the unity of all sentient beings. Buddhism defines itself as Buddha dharma or the dharma of the enlightened ones, which is seen as a tradition transcending time or place 2E Yoga defines itself as part of the Hindu tradition called Sanatana Dharma, the universal or eternal dharma, which is not defined according to any particular teacher or tradition. Both traditions have called themselves Arya Dharma or the Dharma of noble men.
The main differences between the two systems are over their cosmic view and way ofpractice. Vedic systems are built upon fundamental principles like the Self (Atman), the Creator (Ishvara), and Godhead (Brahman). Buddhism rejects all such ontological principles as mere creations of the mind itself. In this regard Vedic systems are more idealistic and Buddhism systems more phenomenological.
Apart from such philosophical differences both systems share the same basic ethical values like non-violence, truthfulness, non-attachment and non-stealing. The vows that Buddhist monks take and those that monks and sadhus take in the Yoga tradition are the same, so are those of Jain monks.
Vedanta defines the absolute as a metaphysical principle Being-Consciousness-Bliss, or Brahman in which there is perfect peace and liberation. Buddhism does recognize an Absolute, which is non-dual and beyond all birth and death. However Buddhism generally does not allow it any definition and regards it as void. It is sometimes called the Dharmakaya or body of dharma, though Sanskrit Buddhist texts never call it Brahman.
Self and not-Self
Buddhism generally rejects the Self (Atma or Purusha) of Yoga-Vedanta and emphasizes the non-Self (anatman). It says that there is no Self in anything and therefore that the Self is merely a fiction of the mind. Whatever we point out as the Self, the Buddhists state, is merely some impression, thought or feeling, but no such homogenous entity like a Self can be found anywhere. Buddhism has tended to lump the Self of Vedanta as another form of the ego or the misconception that there is a Self.
The Yoga-Vedanta tradition emphasizes Self-realization or the realization of our true nature. It states that the Self does not exist in anything external. If we cannot find a self in anything it is no wonder, because if we did find a self in something it would not be the self but that particular thing. We cannot point out anything as the Self because the Self is the one who points all things out. The Self transcends the mind-body complex, but this is not to say that it does not exist. Without the Self we would not exist. We would not even be able to ask questions.
Yoga-Vedanta discriminates between the Self (Atman), which is our true nature as consciousness, and the ego (generally called Ahamkara), which is the false identification of our true nature with the mind-body complex. The Atman of Vedanta is not the ego but is the enlightened awareness which transcends time and space.
However a number of Buddhist traditions, particularly traditions outside of India, like the Chan and Zen traditions of China, have used terms like Self-mind, one's original nature, the original nature of consciousness or one's original face, which are similar to the Self of Vedanta.
Mind and Self
Buddhism defines reality in terms of mind and often refers to ultimate truth as the One Mind or original nature of the mind. In Yoga mind (manas) is regarded as an instrument of consciousness which is the Self. It speaks of the One Self and the many minds which are its vehicles. For it mind is not an ultimate principle but an aspect of creation.
If we examine the terms mind and Self in the two traditions it appears that what Yoga criticizes as attachment to the mind and ego is much like the Buddhist criticism of the attachment to the self, while what Vedanta calls the Supreme Self is similar to the Buddhist idea of the original nature of the Mind or One Mind. The Self is the unborn, uncreate reality similar to what Buddhism refers to as the transcendent aspect of Mind. The enlightened mind which dwells within the heart of the Buddhists (Bodhicitta) resembles the Supreme Self (Paramatman) which also dwells within the heart. Yet these similarities aside, the formulations and methodologies of the two systems in this regard can be quite different. Classical Indian Buddhist texts do not make such correlations either, but insist that the Vedantic Self is different than the One Mind of Buddhism.
God or the Creator
The yogic tradition is based upon a recognition of, respect for and devotion to God or the creator, preserver and destroyer of the universe. One of its main principles is that of surrender to God (Ishvara-Pranidhana), which is said to be the most direct method to Self-realization. Some degree of theism exists in the various Yoga-Vedanta teachings, though in Advatic systems Ishvara is subordinated to the Self-Absolute, which transcend even the Creator. This is perhaps the main point of difference between Yoga and Buddhism. Buddhism rejects God (Ishvara) or a cosmic lord and creator. It sees no need for any creator and considers that living beings arise through karma alone. The Dalai Lama recently noted that Buddha is similar to God in omniscience but is not a creator of the universe.
Yet we do note that some modern Buddhist teachers use the term God and make it equivalent to the Buddha-nature. There is also the figure of the Adi-Buddha or primordial Buddha in some Buddhist traditions who resembles God. The Buddha appears as God not in the sense of a theological entity but as the Divine potential inherent in living beings, but is similarly looked upon as a great being who is prayed to for forgiveness of misdeeds 2E
Karma and Rebirth
Both systems see karma as the main causative factor behind rebirth in the world. However in Buddhism karma is said to be a self-existent principle. Buddhism states that the world exists owing to the beginningless karma of living beings. In the Yoga tradition, however, karma is not a self-existent principle. The world is created by God (Ishvara), the creative aspect of consciousness. Karma as a mere force of inertia and attachment cannot explain the creation of the world but only our attachment to it. Karma is regarded as a force dispensed by God, which cannot exist by itself, just as a law code cannot exist without a judge. However some other Vedic systems, also, like Purva Mimamsa put more emphasis upon karma than upon God.
Yoga recognizes the existence of a Jiva or individual soul who is reborn. Buddhism denies the existence of such a soul and says that rebirth is just the continuance of a stream of karma, not any real entity.
The Figure of the Buddha
All Buddhist traditions go back to the Buddha and most emphasize studying the life of the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni. The Vedic tradition, on the other hand, recognizes many teachers and there is no one teacher that everyone must follow or look back to. There is no single historical figure like the Buddha that dominates the tradition or whom all must follow, honor or worship. Hinduism has accepted Buddha as a great teacher but it has included him among its stream of many other teachers, gurus and avatars. Buddhism does recognize the existence of Buddhas both before and after the historical Buddha, and says that a Buddha comes into the world every 5000 years. It is interesting to note that the previous Buddha to the historical Buddha is called Kashyapa which is also the name of one of the oldest and most important of the Vedic seers. However Buddhism has yet to include any of the great yogis and Rishis of Hinduism as on par with the Buddha as enlightened sages.
The term Buddha itself is common in Vedic teachings, as it is a common Sanskrit term meaning wise, awake, aware or enlightened. When Buddhism is referred to in Hindu literature it is called Bauddha Dharma or Saugata Dharma, as there is nothing in the term Buddha in Sanskrit that refers to a particular person or religion. While Hindus make Buddha into an avatar, in Buddhism Buddha cannot be an avatar because Buddhism has no God that Buddha could manifest. If Buddha is an avatar in Buddhism it is of the enlightened mind, not of the Creator.
Both systems regard Nirvana or mergence in the Absolute as a primary goal of practice. However in the Buddhist tradition, particularly the Theravadin, Nirvana is generally described only negatively as cessation. It is given no positive appellations. In the Vedic tradition Nirvana is described in a positive way as mergence into Brahman or Sacchidananda, Being-Consciousness-Bliss, the realization of the infinite and eternal Self, called Brahma Nirvana. Yet both systems agree that this truth transcends all concepts. Vedanta describes Nirvana as freedom or liberation (Moksha). This term does not occur in Buddhism which does not accept the existence of any soul that can be liberated.
Devotion and Compassion
Yoga with its recognition of God emphasizes devotion and surrender to God (Ishvara-pranidhana) as one of the main spiritual paths. It contains an entire Yogic approach based on devotion, Bhakti Yoga, through which we open our hearts to God and surrender to the Divine Will. As Buddhism does not recognize God, devotion to God does not appear as a Buddhist path. That is why we don't find any significant tradition of great devotees and singers of Divine Love in Buddhism like Chaitanya, Ramakrishna, Tulsidas or Mirabai in the Hindu tradition.
Buddhism does recognize devotion to the Buddha or faith in the Buddha-mind. However devotion to great teachers or to functions of the enlightened mind does not quite strike the human heart with the same significance as devotion to the Divine Father and Mother of the Universe, the creator, preserver and destroyer of all, which requires a recognition of God.
Not having God to guide and protect living beings, Buddhism has developed the role of the Bodhisattva, the enlightened one who stays on after enlightenment to teach and guide living beings. As according to Yoga God and all the sages merged in him are ever present to help all beings, so there is no need for such a special Bodhisattva vow. Yoga values compassion as an ethical principle, however, and says that we cannot realize our true Self as long as we think that we are separate from other creatures.
Gods and Goddesses/ Buddhas and Bodhisattvas
Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, technically speaking, are not deities or Gods and Goddesses. They are not forms of the Divine Father and Mother and have no role in creating, preserving and destroying the universe. They are not the parents of all creatures but merely wise guides and teachers. They are often described as great beings who once lived and attained enlightenment at some point in time and took various vows to stay in the world to help save living beings.
For example perhaps the greatest Buddhist Goddess, Tara is such a Bodhisattva, an enlightened person - not the Divine Mother like Durga or Kali of Hinduism - but a great enlightened sage who has continued to exist in the world to help living beings. She is not the Goddess or a form of God but a personal expression of the enlightened mind and its power of compassion. There are also meditation Buddhas (Dhyani Buddhas), who represent archetypes of enlightenment.
Yet though the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are not forms of God, they can be prayed toto provide grace and protection. For example, the Bodhisattva Tara was thought to save those in calamities. Worship of various Bodhisattvas is called Deity Yoga in the Tibetan tradition.
If we can equate the One Mind of the Buddhists with the One Self of Vedanta, make Buddha and God the same and give the Buddha the power of creation of the universe, and make other such correlations, both traditions could be synthesized. However this would essentially absorb Buddhism into Hinduism and make the Buddhist rejection of the Vedas unnecessary. This is what most Hindus incline do with Buddhism. However prominent Buddhist leaders have yet to make such statements. Until they do we cannot dismiss such differences as unnecessary but must respect them as a different view of truth or different approach to it. If you believe not only in karma and rebirth but also the existence of God or the Creator, you would be a Hindu, not a Buddhist in your views.
Choosing a Path
There are a number of people in the West today, and even in India, who are combining Yoga and Buddhism, as well as less related traditions. Some people may try to follow gurus in both traditions (generally without the approval of the teachers). Of course, teachings which are common to both traditions like non-violence are obviously easy to correlate. Different meditation techniques, however, may not be so easy to combine. For example it may be difficult to meditate upon the Supreme Self of Vedanta, while meditating upon the non-Self of Buddhism. The Buddhist approach requires doubting that there is any self at all. The Vedantic approach requires complete faith in the Self and merging everything into it. Above all it is hard to maintain certain devotional approaches in a Buddhist context where there is no real God or Creator.
In this eclectic age such synthetic experimentation is bound to continue and may prove fruitful in some instances, particularly when one is still searching out one's path. Yet it frequently gets people lost or confused, trying to mix teachings together they do not really understand. Jumping back and forth between teachers and traditions may prevent us from getting anywhere with any of them. Superficial synthesis, which is largely a mental exercise, is no substitute for deep practice that requires dedicated concentration. The goal is not to combine the paths but to reach to the goal, which requires taking a true path out to the end. While there maybe many paths up to the top of a mountain, one will not climb far cross-crossing between paths. Above all it is not for students on the path to try to combine paths. It is for the masters, the great lineage bearers in the traditions, to do so, if this is necessary.
Today we are entering into a global age that requires the development of a global spirituality. This requires honoring all forms of the inner quest regardless of where and when they come from. The unity of truth cuts across all boundaries and breaks down all divisions between human beings. It is crucial that such meditation traditions as Yoga and Buddhism form a common front in light of the needs of the global era. All such true spiritual traditions face many common enemies in this materialistic age. Their common values of protecting the earth, non-violence, recognition of the law of karma, and the practice of meditation are perhaps the crucial voice to deliver us out of our present crisis.
But in coming together the diversity of teachings should be preserved, which means not only recognizing their unity but respecting their differences. This is the same issue as that of different cultures. While we should recognize the unity of humanity, we should allow various cultures to preserve their unique forms, and not simply throw them all into one big melting pot, in which all their distinctions are lost. True unity is universality that fosters a creative multiplicity, not a uniformity that reduces everything to a stereotype. Truth is not only One but Infinite and cannot be reduced to any final forms. Pluralism is also true as each individual is unique and we should have a broad enough view to allow others to have contrary opinions. As the Vedic Rishis stated, "That which is the One Truth the seers teach in diverse ways." This is to accommodate all the different types and levels of souls.
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF VEDIC STUDIES
PO Box 8357, Santa Fe NM, 87504-8357
David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri), Director
The Urban Dharma Newsletter Archives:
The Los Angeles Buddhist-Catholic Dialogue:
Support www.UrbanDharma.org with a Donation:
The Urban Dharma Podcast and Audio Dharma Talks: