IAHF Webmaster:

Breaking News, Whats New, NAFTA, GATT, WTO, Canada, All Countries

IAHF List:

This is genocide unfolding, an effort to cull our numbers, but we don't have to sit back and TAKE it. I'm sure not! I'm educating as many people as humanly possible and you can help by forwarding this to as many people as possible.

What can be done? We can educate our friends, family and neighbors. Pass on the url for the trailer for The Corporation Documentary http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/the_corporation.html, read the info below, write letters to the editors of local papers and get politically active in the fight back by urging your friends to sign on at http://www.iahf.com and please donate via paypal and via
IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd. Point Roberts WA 98281 USA :

X-Originating-IP: []
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kevin Annett
Subject: please post and circulate: secret water export agreements
To: beabernhausen@yahoo.com

This is the plan to control the water.....and you.


The Quebec Referendum
The Grand Canal Project
US-Canadian Continental Union by 2005

The series of postings that you are about to see tell
a story so amazing, so full of callous corruption and
greed, so destructive to the Quebec and Cree peoples
and to the Canadian nation, and so *well-concealed* by
those in the Canadian media who are *fully aware* of
these details, that you deserve a full and clear
introduction to each of the main narrators:

GLEN KEALEY: is the former Hull, Quebec, commercial
developer who exposed the system of organized crime
and corruption run by ex-Prime Minister Mulroney's
government and the complicity of the RCMP and the
justice system.
In 1986 Kealey was asked for a bribe by Public Works
Minister Roch LaSalle, who offered him government
support for his project in exchange for 5% of all
government contributions on top of $5,000 up front.
Investigating, Kealey found evidence of a massive
bribe and kickback scheme operated and controlled
right out of the Prime Minister's Office, and a close
collaboration between the Tories, the media and the
police. Kealey successfully charged 16 people,
including members of the government and RCMP, with
criminal conspiracy. He is co-chair of THE CANADIAN
1705; fax 613-747 1644]

SHELLEY ANN CLARK: the executive assistant to Germain
Denis, Brian Mulroney's personal appointee to the Free
Trade Agreement negotiations, during which plans were
made to dismember and demolish Canada, first by
Quebec's separation, and then by Continental Union in

GEORGE KRALIK: An eleven-year veteran of the Canadian
Armed Forces.



Kralik: I would like to ask you about the water, our
natural resources in water. What is it to be used for?
How is it to be transported?

Kealey: Think of money. If you had your choice, if you
could pull a genie out of a bottle and the genie could
grant three wishes, what would your three wishes be?
Remember your goal is to make the most money possible?

Kralik: I should really have to think a lot about
that, but...

Kealey: I would say: 'Number one, give me control over
the sun. Number two, give me control over the air.
Number three give me control over water.' Now, leaving
our little genie aside, we know we cannot control the
sun, nor can we control the air. BUT WE CAN CONTROL
WATER. On the scale of things that are required for
human life, it is the most important element that can
be controlled.

Kralik: What do you mean when you say 'control'?

Kealey: OK. In GATT, General Agreement on Trades and
Tariffs, it says that free-flowing water is not
a'good'. The key wording is 'free-flowing'. If you
construct a dam it is no longer free-flowing and
therefore it becomes private property, owned by
somebody, capable of being sold to others, or

Kralik: If it is dammed?

Kealey: If it is dammed. Any time the free-flowing
water has been obstructed. Of course in GATT, there is
much talk about bottled water.

Kralik: It's a side trick?

Kealey: It's a side trick. The biggest scam ever to be
pulled on the entire world is Free Trade and I'll tell
you why.

There is a lady in Ottawa by the name of Shelley Ann
Clark. She was the executive secretary to the third
highest negotiator during the Free Trade deal. His
name was Germain Denis. His two visible superiors were
Gordon Ritchie and Simon Riesman. Before he became
Free Trade negotiator, Simon Reisman had a difficult
job. He was the director of a project called the Grand
Canal, which is to be built from James Bay.

In 1985-86, my offices were in Hull in the commercial
part in Place de Portage, the government complex which
houses the Supply and Services Offices. [NOTE: Hull,
Quebec is just across the river from Ottawa, Ontario,
and is filled with federal offices and civil servants]
One day I was visited by a man named Art Bailey.
Bailey was a former Assistant Deputy Minister of
Supply and Services and had been following the
development of my project, the Micot Building. I had
raised a hundred and sixty million bucks to build this
high tech centre in Hull. We had bought the land and
were just about ready to start construction when Art
Bailey walked into my office. 'Mr. Kealey,'he said,
'You've done a fantastic job of marketing this Micot
Building. Nobody would ever have believed that anyone
could raise a hundred and sixty million dollars to
build a building in Hull - this is totally out of sync
with anything that anybody believed.' So he said, 'We
think you're the best marketing man in Canada and that
you should come and join our team and become the
Marketing Manager for the Grand Canal.'

I said, 'What the hell's the Grand Canal? I don't know
what you're talking about.' So he gave me a document -
a twenty to twenty-five page document - which I read.
This is what I read: James Bay is five hundred miles
north to south, is a hundred and twenty miles across
at the mouth, salt water on the average thirty-five to
forty-five feet deep. If a dam were to be constructed
at the mouth of James Bay and Hudson's Bay and a
second one, one third down, and a third, a third down
again - therefore three dams - it would allow over a
period of ten years for water to flow from the fresh
water rivers and would push the salt water back beyond
the dams and create the largest fresh water reservoir
known to man. So much so that a canal could be built
leading out of the south-east corner of James Bay,
south over the mountain ranges with dykes and locks
and whatever you need to lift water for eight hundred
miles, then at Rouen-Noranda in northern Quebec,
nature's gravity would take over and the water would
start going down the other side of the mountain range,
in Ontario, the Ottawa River and the French River
systems, past Kirkland lake and eventually it would
end up in Georgian Bay [in Lake Superior]. The amount
of water that would be brought back - fresh water from
that Canal - could double the flow of water that now
enters the Great lakes. Of course, if you can double
the water entering the Great lakes you can take half
of the total water out without changing anything in
the Great Lake System.

The water would be removed in two places: at the base
of Lake Michigan - they don't need it this year, this
year they have enough water - they would open up the
sluices and move water down to the Mississippi Delta,
almost all the way to Mexico, in the Gulf of Mexico;
the second outlet would be from Lake Superior, moving
water across Manitoba, into Saskatchewan, then down
into the United States to bring water to the Mid West
and South West of the United States. We must
understand, of course, that since we are living in a
period of global warming, the bread basket of North
America which is situated in one place now, moves
further north as it gets warmer, making the bottom
part arid. So water is absolutely critical to enlarge
the bread basket of North America as the earth gets

There is another dimension: if Canadian waters,
presently flowing into and towards the Arctic and the
North of Canada, are diverted and artificially made to
flow in a southerly direction (for instance diverted
towards the United States for water use), then the
Northern cold climate temperatures will move in a
southerly direction and the Canadian terrain will
become colder and more frigid; the balance of the
Canadian climate will be reduced temperature, which
will cause a massive environmental shift in Canada,
all to Canada's detriment.

This theory can be supported by simple physics and
hydrology. The waters flowing north are of a warmer
temperature and have a warm front pushing against the
Arctic North temperatures; if removed, the Arctic
North will move South. It doesn't matter whether this
occurs in summer or the winter seasons. If the rivers
and waters are diverted to flow southerly then one
will require more fuel to heat our homes and
buildings; however, Canadians will only have what is
available after the U.S. has its needs supplied under
the NAFTA Agreement, etc.

The two transnationals who were pushing this plan were
R. J. R. Nabisco (the biggest agribusiness in the
United States), led by a Mr. Johnson out of Winnipeg -
there's been a film made of him recently called
"Barbarians at the Gate" and it shows how he tried to
take over the company with junk bonds and whatever;
and the other one was Archer Daniels Midland, which
cans and boxes or packages all of the agri-business
that comes in from R.J.R. Nabisco and distributes it
throughout the world. It is interesting, of course,
that Mr. Johnson was Mulroney's sponsor, bringing him
on tours throughout the U.S. and that Archer Midland
Daniels has just hired [ex-Prime Minister] Mulroney
[who pushed both Free Trade and NAFTA through the
Canadian Parliament] as a director.

I traveled across Western Canada and there have been
public demonstrations recently in B.C., Alberta, and
Saskatchewan over the building of dams and Kemano in
B.C., Old Man River in Alberta and Alimeda in Rafferty
dams in Saskatchewan. People ask why are they building
dams where there is no water. Once you understand the
relationship of the Grand Canal to the entire area you
then know where the water will be coming from.

Kralik: Do you see any possible ecological disasters
as a result this ?

Kealey: Of course. Some natives believe the sheer
weight of the water behind the dams will cause the
axis of the earth to shift and if you build a dam you
change the chemistry of the earth. You cannot flood
the areas that we are talking about without changing
the configuration of the soil and landscape. But
transnationals don't think in those terms: they think
in terms of money. In 1985-86 it was stated t hat the
project would cost two hundred billion dollars (U.S.).
It was also stated that the money was available.

American Express wants to be the banker and do you
think that it is by coincidence that American Express
was allowed, by Order of Council, to become a Bank in
Canada, with Brian Mulroney breaking fourteen banking
regulations just to allow them to achieve this status?

As well, Alcan Aluminum needs dams for their mines and
Barrick for their gold-owning concerns. Mulroney also
signed Orders in Council breaking the law that made it
illegal for foreigners to own more than fifty percent
of a mine in Canada.Now foreigners can own mines
outright in Canada: there are no restrictions.

None of these changes in the rules were made through
Parliament but by a stroke of Brian Mulroney's pen.
Most people in Canada Live with the illusion that laws
are written by Parliament, but most regulations are
changed by politicians in power. For every law that
passes though Parliament, there are three thousand
laws that are changed unilaterally behind the scenes.

In any case, Simon Riesman put forward a plan to have
us put aside our 'old concepts' and to start thinking
'boldly about the future'. By that he meant nothing
less than giving up Canada: we need to have a new
political reality, he argued, and therefore Free Trade
and water diversion go hand in hand. We also know, he
surmised, that if the US asked us for either water or
free trade, Canadians would rebel: so let us make it
appear that Canada is doing the asking. Mulroney was
bought with the Bankers' money and he did the asking,
publicly stating the opposite of what he had always
contended: that he didn't believe in Free Trade, etc.

Back Room Manipulations in the Free Trade Deal
I know what was negotiated in the Free Trade deal and
how the deal was done because my executive secretary
[NOTE: now his wife] is Shelley Ann Clark, who worked
as the executive secretary to Germain Denis, the third
highest-ranking negotiator. This is how the deal was
done - Simon Reisman and Gordon Ritchie went to
Washington and gave away Canada and as they were
giving away Canada they were at the time preparing a
briefing book on a computer which appeared
simultaneously on a computer in Ottawa. Mulroney and
Denis worked together and Shelley Ann Clark was the
secretary working between the two of them.

There was one hitch. Although the Federal Government
did not legally need the permission of the Premiers,
politically Free Trade would have been impossible to
sell unless the Premiers were on side. So two Premiers
were bought by Mulroney - the Premier of Alberta and
the Premier of Saskatchewan. They became Mulroney's
moles within the Premier's camp.

Their job was to go around and identify the acceptable
bottom lines in terms of textiles, agriculture,
mining, subsidies, unemployment insurance, health care
- all of the things that affect our sovereignty. What
would the Premiers be prepared to sacrifice? The two
moles would then bring the info to Denis, whose job it
was to brief the Premiers approximately eight times
during the negotiations.

How was this done? Since there were a bunch of
Premiers who would have disagreed fundamentally if
they knew what was really happening, and you knew what
their bottom lines were, Premiers' briefings were
always given at 50 O'Connor on the seventeenth floor.
At midnight the night before a briefing, Shelley Ann
Clark would be told to come into Denis' office - only
he and she would be in the office - and call up the
briefing books on the computer. She would then be
ordered to re-name a copy of the entire briefing book
negotiated that day to The Provincial Briefing Book.
Denis would then take the notes he had got from the
Premiers about the bottom lines and go through the
main document paragraph by paragraph.

Here are some examples. He would come to the section
on 'Water'- build a Grand Canal, build dams, move
water to the U.S. - and he would say,'Delete that
paragraph and insert a line that says 'free-flowing
water is not included in this deal." Textiles? 'If it
said we have given up sixty percent, change it to
twelve.' Ms.Clark would change it to twelve.

Agriculture? 'Cut back on the production of turkeys
forty percent. Write in eight.'

And they would go through the entire book like that.
At the end - at about three o'clock in the morning -
they would produce ten copies. Every page of each new
copy was numbered so that if a page went missing or
was copied in any way, they would know which Premier
would have done it.

Not that they were given a chance to do this! The
Premiers would arrive for the briefing session, always
complaining about not having been given the books
ahead of time. 'It is too sensitive,' they were told,
'here's the Briefing Book.' At the end of the session
Denis would pick up the Briefing Books, and Shelley
Anne Clark would shred nine of the books and keep one,
so that Denis would remember what lies he had told
when he would have to change the books next time.

Kralik: The reason why he changed the percentages of
the cutbacks in productions was to make it look

Kealey: And acceptable, politically, to the Premiers.
That they were not giving away what they *were* giving
away. And once it is given away, how can you ever get
it back?

Kralik: What they were negotiating, with relation to
textiles, turkeys, or whatever was a kind of smoke-
screen cover for the big Grand Canal ?

Kealey: Everything in there was doctored. There were
two key issues that we didn't hear anything about: the
integration of Canada into the United States, and the
movement of water through the Grand Canal. Those are
the two key issues. How do you do that without anybody
knowing? On 3 October 1987 the Free Trade Agreement
was signed in Washington. A thirty-three page summary
was delivered to Parliament. *The original text has
never been seen by the public.* A year later a legal
document of some fifteen hundred pages detailing the
ramifications of certain items was made public and is
used by lawyers today. *But what is not known, what
has not been seen is the original Free Trade Deal
which is at least two hundred and some odd pages
long.* Because Shelley Ann Clark knows what she knows,
and because of the contacts that she now has, she is a
threat to the government [i.e. the previous, Mulroney,
government] Last December (1992) they sent her home on
full pay.

Kralik: Laid off.

Kealey: No, not laid off. She has her full pay. She
was told, 'Go home. We don't want you talking to
people.' What they didn't know then, was that home for
her meant, in July 1993, becoming my executive

Kralik: What a bonus! That is great!

Kealey: They haven't touched her in any way because
they were afraid. She still has her top security
clearance, but when she went to the archives and asked
to see the Free Trade Documents, she was given an
index which she skimmed through and questioned:
'There's no Premier's Briefing Books here?' The guy
answered: 'Well it's possible. We didn't get
everything. We don't know. We just get what we get.'
So she said, 'May I see the Free Trade Deal ? "Oh,
no,'he resumed,' under the Statute that governs access
to information, ninety-five percent of the Free Trade
Deal has been declared a security problem for Canada
and is not being made available to the public. Even
with your top security clearance, you could not get it
unless you had the 0.K. from the Deputy Minister of
External Affairs.' So she said, 'You know who I am and
that's not possible: he would never give it to me.'
She was told, 'In any event the Free Trade Deal is in
canisters 16 miles outside of Ottawa and is not to be
seen by Canadians for thirty years. "This doesn't make
any sense in a democratic country,' she said,'Why can
the people not see it? I know what is in it and it's a
danger to our national security all right. It gives
the country away and thirty years from now it is going
to be too late. The implementation schedule ends at
2005. The Grand Canal must be in place and Quebec must
be separate.

The Integration of Canada and the United States
Kealey: Plot for a movie: The date is the early
1960's. Dag Hammerskjold, the Secretary General of the
UN, is flying between countries on the Lower African
continent. He has been trouble-shooting border
disputes which are being caused by the competition for
access to mineral deposits.

Suddenly two fighter planes pull up alongside the UN
plane and, without warning, shoot it down with
missiles. The next day the world media report it as an

Fade to secret rendez-vous: Two mercenaries (the
pilots of the fighter planes) are paid by under-cover
agent employed by the TRANSNATIONAL MINING CABAL
(funded by Rothschild-Rockefeller).

Fade to the New York (or Philadelphia) boardroom of
Hanna Mining. It is now the late 1970's.

The same under-cover agent, an employee of Hanna
Mining, quietly admits his role in the assassination
to the Board of Directors. The admission bothers no
one. Attention then turns to another internal problem.
A Canadian branch operation company President, Brian
Mulroney, of The Iron Ore Company of Canada, is being
asked to shut down the Schefferville mine in Quebec.
This is a very profitable mine, but one which competes
successfully against the less profitable U.S. mines
the Cabal also own. Mulroney is not-so-subtly reminded
(blackmailed) by other directors, who threaten to
expose the way he once looted the company pension fund
in order to start the construction of his grand pet
project, the Lord's Inn, which is to be built in
Labrador (the hotel is an exact replica of Montreal's
Ritz Carleton Hotel). Mulroney wisely agrees.

Fades to Schefferville. Families are being torn apart
by the closing of the mine. Mulroney pays off the
trouble-makers and the local media to keep things
quiet. He badly wants to become a national politician
and doesn't need bad publicity.

Fade to Paris, France. It is now October 1980: George
Bush, Edward Meese, Earl Casey and a Dr. Brian are
observed surreptitiously negotiating with Iranians.
They want them to hold onto the American hostages
until after the US elections and the inauguration on
20 January 1981. They promise arms for the hostages if
Ronald Reagan is elected. They also agree to sell the
Iranians more arms later, to raise money for the
Nicaraguan Contras.

Fade to Washington. It is 20 January 1981: Reagan and
Bush are being inaugurated. The hostages are being
released simultaneously.

Fade to Oval office. It is 21 January 1981: Trans-
national corporate leaders and bankers tell Reagan,
'The US is broke. If it were corporation it would be
shut down. The answer lies in a political merger with
Canada. But first the two countries must be
'HARMONIZED'. The plan evolves on the spot (between
1985 and 2005):

Back Mulroney with cash and spin-doctors. Send money
through the Mormon Bishop of Virginia, up to Winnipeg,
and then to Montreal.

Once elected, link Mulroney with Simon Reisman, the
former Deputy Minister of Finance. Reisman is
presently the Director of the Grand Canal fresh water
diversion scheme.

Appoint Reisman to lead a negotiating team which
arrives from Canada begging for a Free Trade Deal. Let
them pretend to be negotiating while they actually
just follow a given pre-set IMPLEMENTATION SCHEME
designed to harmonize Canada's laws to the USA.

Write into the Free Trade deal the secret arrangements
made to change Canada's foreign ownership laws by

Replace the Canadian Government with the Bankers'
second division team, the Liberals (TORY II). This
will help allay most peoples' fears and continue the
illusion of existing democracy and independence.

Manage the separation of Quebec by placing the
trans-national bankers' man, Lucien Bouchard, at the
head of the separatist movement.

Get the Canadian Government to back native claims
against Quebec and publicly support the native's right
to self-determination.

Keep scaring Canadians with talk of the deficit. Raise
taxes, reduce services. Increase drug patent
protection. Cut employment to a minimum. People will
then accept any conditions for employment proposed
later, by the wealthy trans-national job creators.
Build more dams.

Borrow 100 billion dollars for the construction of
water diversion projects across the north. When the
project is at its mid-point, try to borrow a further
100 billion dollars. This second loan will be denied.

When the International Monetary Fund declares that
Canada is clearly insolvent, a general panic sets in.
The Prime Minister runs down to Washington to plead
for more credit. He is told loans are available on the
condition Canada merges with the USA. This new deal
would create a new country - the United States of
NORTH America.

The PM returns to Canada and informs Canadians about
the American offer. He states, 'there is no other
choice'and civil war breaks out in Quebec. Natives of
Ungava (northern Quebec) declare unilateral
independence. The QPF attack native reserves from
helicopters. The PM calls upon the UN for military
assistance - on the pretext of defending the CREE
[from the attacking Quebec forces].

Military from Fort Drum, New York, all wearing the UN
Blue Berets, cross the border at Kingston. Within two
hours they surround Parliament in Ottawa. Others move
north by air and take charge of the power Plant at
James Bay.

Later, Quebec is partitioned by the UN and the World
Bank takes control of the water projects. Quebec is
placed under a UN-sponsored economic blockade until
they finally agree to use English as the working
language. Quebec becomes the 55th State of the USNA
etc., etc., etc.
Kealey: Let us take all of this a little more slowly:
a plane is flying over Africa with the Secretary
General of the United Nations sitting in it when all
of a sudden two fighter planes show up alongside and
shoot it down. Movie switches back over to a boardroom
with the heads of TRANSNATIONAL corporations in
mining, agri-business and finance in the US planning
for the election of their man to lead the United
States for four terms, George Bush. The strategy is
devised: put a Charlie McCarthy-type dummy in for the
first eight years, Ronald Reagan, with George Bush's
hand in the back of the jacket which wags and makes
him talk.

Kralik: So it's your opinion that Reagan was a good
front man for George Bush?

Kealey: Bush was the man fronting for the
transnational corporations, former head of the CIA,
involved in drug peddling and raising money for them
in that way.

Upon taking over the reins of the country, George Bush
and Ronald Reagan call in the presidents of the key
transnational companies with their accountants and
say: 'Tell us the real picture.' The accountants tell
them that if the United States were a corporation it
would have to be shut down immediately. It is
bankrupt. 'We have wasted our resources. We have
ruined our cities. Our assets and debts don't

The critical question is then put: what is the
solution? 'There is only one solution. We must merge
Canada politically with the US if we are to re-balance
the books. Canada is virgin country with a multitude
of natural resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc. Add
Canada to the U.S. and you'll have re-balanced the
picture for a long time to come. "How do we do that?
We can't merge Canada and the US politically. Canada
has a province that speaks French. "Get them to
separate! "How do we do that?'

Then the president of Hanna Mining, who has been
sitting the table, stands up and says, 'I have a
division called the Iron Ore Company of Canada and I
have a man there by the name of Brian Mulroney. He
just shut down the town of Schefferville, Quebec for
me, and he did an excellent job. Shutting down Canada
wouldn't be much of a problem for him. Let's bring him
in'. 'Exactly, but, can he be trusted?'

'Well our man Reisman has been Deputy Minister of
Finance in Canada for a while. He is in charge of this
Grand Canal project.We need the water and we can get
them to work together as a team. "But how do we get
the money to them? "The Mormon Church in Virginia is
tied into the Republican party, so we can move the
money across to Utah, then up into Winnipeg (Jake Epp
and his group), keep it all secret and fund Mulroney's
campaign for the leadership of the Conservative party
- then we're in business. 'Don't forget there's just
been a Referendum in Quebec and they voted to stay
with Canada. So there is a job to be done and it can't
be done in a short period of time.'

They decide that it is going to take fourteen or
fifteen years to put the whole project together; in
the interval, the economies, social programs, and laws
of the two countries would be quietly harmonized as
much as possible. 'But you know Canadians are pretty
up tight about things like that, so you can't tell
them, you've got to keep things fairly quiet. "Don't
worry about it. We own the leaders of the Liberal
party and the leaders of the Tory party. They are all
on our team: it is just that ordinary bureaucrats
don't know what game they are playing.'

We have here a project that begins in 1981, is
formalized through 1981 and 1982. In 1983 Mulroney
wins a seat in Nova Scotia. In 1984 there is one Tory
in Quebec, his name is Roch La Salle and he sees this
hoard of people and money pouring in in support of
this Brian Mulroney. If Mulroney gets elected in
Quebec, Roch La Salle's power will evaporate, so he
fights tooth and nail with Joe Clark to try to keep
Mulroney out.

On election day Mulroney wins. He is now the leader of
the Conservative Party and he becomes the leader of
the government of Canada on 4 September 1984. The next
thing that happens is that within eleven days of the
election four break-ins occur: at PC headquarters in
Montreal, PC party headquarters, PC Canada Fund, and
at the office of David Angus (Mulroney's
communications director) and Rodrigue Pageau
(Mulroney's chief of Staff).

The four break-ins are noticed on the following Monday
morning. Montreal police are called in. The break-ins
are unusual in the sense that only information has
been taken: the safe that contained the documents as
to the source of Mulroney's funds, computer discs, a
photocopier on which they had attempted first to copy
documents but obviously ran out of time, and a

Yet there was cash, calculators, and typewriters that
were not touched at all. The safe was heavy enough
that it required at least three people to lift and
take out.

The Montreal Police were conducting their
investigation when along came a member of the RCMP,
Denis LaPointe, who stated: 'I've been sent from
Ottawa to find out how the investigations are coming
along. Can I help?' Without his knowledge, a reporter
overheard the conversation, Richard Cleroux of The
Globe and Mail, and a story is printed in the Globe
that night.

The next morning the phone rings at The Globe and
Mail. Denis LaPointe is mad as hell: 'What business is
it of yours to write that?' Of course, in fact,
LaPointe had no authority to be there: he hadn't been
assigned to go there, but was acting undercover for
Brian Mulroney or Roch LaSalle and other politicians,
without Commissioner Simmonds knowing this was even
taking place.

When you probe into Denis LaPointe's background you
will find that he was raised in Joliette, Quebec. His
best buddies were Roch LaSalle and Frank Majeau and he
and Roch were involved in businesses; Majeau was
LaSalle's executive assistant but Majeau's main
business was 'prestige entertainment'. 'Prestige
Entertainment' delivered strippers to all the clubs in
Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec and moved drugs out
of Mirabel airport and the port of Montreal through
these strippers. This was actively assisted by a
limousine service owned by two Iranians. These people
were all linked.

Within a matter of days, the Montreal Police were told
to forget the investigation: 'It's not important.
Nothing they took was of any value.' But when Frank
Majeau came to testify at the hearing in 1991, he
revealed what subsequently had transpired. It was that
Roch LaSalle was invited to Quebec City by Mulroney's
accountant, Michel Cote, who had just been elected and
who had become the Minister of Consumer and Corporate
Affairs responsible for the Post Office as well. And
Michel Cote did something very strange for Roch
LaSalle, the sworn enemy of Brian Mulroney: he paid
off his entire debt load - four hundred thousand
dollars, mostly gambling debts to Frank Catroni. He
was THE BOSS: they are the Mob - the Mafia.

The second curious thing that happened was that Brian
Mulroney appointed Roch LaSalle Minister of Public
Works; when you understand the potential for
corruption at Public Works you realize that you don't
put Colonel Sanders in charge of the chicken coop and
expect the chickens to be there when you come to

The third thing that happened was that Andre
Bissonette, who had won the election in St. Jean, was
made Minister for Small Business, responsible for the
Federal Business Development Bank and although the
Federal Business Development Bank will normally loan
seventy-five thousand dollars to companies to save
them from going under and laying off people (a large
loan is a hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars,
but the average is about seventy-five). Lo and behold,
in this case The Federal Business Development Bank
made loans to thirty-nine strip clubs in Eastern
Ontario and Western Quebec, loans of five hundred
thousand dollars, nine hundred thousand dollars - a
total of seventeen million dollars.

The preponderance of circumstantial evidence therefore
suggests that Roch laSalle, Lapointe (a member of the
RCMP) and Frank Majeau (a member of the mob), stole
the safe, got the goods on Mulroney, blackmailed him
and got him to appoint LaSalle to his important
position: Minister of Public Works.

Of course [RCMP] Commissioner Simmonds, not knowing
about this internal arrangement proceeded to
investigate almost all of them during Mulroney's first
mandate as they were being caught all over the place
with their hands in the till. Simmonds, you wilI
remember, was called to a meeting with Trudeau when
Trudeau was looking for a new Commissioner of the
RCMP. Simmonds was asked the question, 'If you were
made Commissioner of the RCMP and you discovered
tomorrow that I was a crook, what would you do?' His
answer was, 'I would arrest you personally, Sir,' and
Trudeau to his credit appointed him Commissioner of
the RCMP.

Facilitating the Separation of Quebec
Simmonds was not the type of RCMP Commissioner that
Mulroney needed. For Mulroney was empowered to destroy
the country and to destroy the country he had to build
a fund that could finance the separation of Quebec. As
we know, he brought in his friend Lucien Bouchard to
lead the project: by adding five percent to the
contracts and getting his team in position within the
RCMP so that they could peddle drugs, the fund grew to
such an extent that when he left power there was
sufficient money to continue playing the game from
behind the scenes.

What we have today is Mulroney's plan: one truly
National Party, the Liberals, with the most hated
politician in Quebec as its head, Jean Chretien. Next
you have Lucien Bouchard leading the Official
Opposition with the biggest block of Separatists ever,
and last you have Preston Manning, leading a Reform
Party - one gang that says, 'We're leaving,' and the
other one that says, 'Go to hell.'

Kralik: To facilitate the split?

Kealey: To facilitate the split because this is what
is required. You cannot integrate Canada and the
United States as long as Quebec is there. Step number
one is the separation of Quebec by 1995. Step number
two is, sadly, to merge the rest of Canada with the
United States. Shelley Ann Clark says the material she
saw in the Trade Negotiations Office cited Canada as a
fifty-first state. Other CIA agents I know have stated
fifty-first, fifty-second, fifty-third, and
fifty-fourth states: the maritimes, Ontario, the
prairies, British Columbia with the northern
territories - four states. The third step is a
revolution by the Cree of Northern Quebec against a
separate Quebec - saying we're not going!

Kralik: A smoke screen?

Kealey: While the natives don't know the game, their
leaders must certainly know where they are going. More
likely than not they would have been bought off. The
natives themselves have no way of fighting back.
Quebec cabinet ministers want to buy helicopters
because that is the only effective military vehicle
for that kind of war, to put the natives in their
place. In all likelihood the United Nations would be
called in under the pretext of 'protecting'the
indigenous peoples of Northern Quebec from the
'oppressive' Quebecois who want them to be a part of
an independent Quebec. Blue berets will be placed on
the heads of whom? Most likely, the soldiers located
at Fort Drum, across the bridge from Kingston
[Ontario]. Fort Drum is the largest military
establishment in the US, with a ground surface larger
than Metro Toronto, supposedly there for desert and
jungle warfare training but really to control the
subversive elements in Canada, and specifically the
Cree in the north.

First, they overwhelm the Cree in the far north. Then
they get their hands on James Bay. Quebec is shrunken
down to its 1867 boundaries - five hundred miles long,
a hundred miles north to south along the St. Lawrence

Now they have a hand on the hydro switch: they build
the Grand Canal with the water moving not through
Quebec but around Quebec: Quebec becomes an island
surrounded by the United States of North America. The
water is not free-flowing and is, therefore, a 'good'
under GATT and the North American Free Trade
Agreement. So it becomes saleable and controllable,
but under the agreements we must give the US always at
least what they feel is necessary for their purposes.
We can increase the supply in gas and water but we can
never cut back. We can never get back what we are
giving away. During a crisis we would have to plead
with them to rescue us, and in that situation we
would, in all likelihood, be treated like Louisiana or
some of the poorer states of the US.

A One-World Government
In this Free Trade Agreement, the US gets the clean
profitable business. Canada is the attic - the
warehouse of all the raw materials. Mexico is the
boiler room, the basement where all the dirty work is
done. That's the plan.

Kralik: Do you see this as a stepping-stone toward the
building of a New World Order and its consolidation in
a single global economy?

Kealey: Of course. The government that is being set up
through the United Nations resembles a church: five
percent of receipts goes to the poor - in Somalia,
Ethiopia, or whatever - although sometimes, as in
Somalia, it comes accompanied with guns. 95% goes
toward the maintenance of power and control. What
control? The International Monetary Fund, The World
Bank, and The Security Council, GATT.

Kralik: Who runs the International Monetary Fund?

Kealey: The bankers.

Kralik: Do you know who these bankers are?

Kealey: There are some fifteen or sixteen different
families but by far the two most influential are the
Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Up to the end of the
last century the Rothschilds operated strictly in
Europe, but they were anxious to synthesize the
American operation with their own. Investigators were
sent out and it was agreed that a railroad family, the
Rockefellers, were prepared to play the game, and so
they became the western arm of this operation.

Then in 1913 we have the biggest scam of all: the
denationalizing of the making of money and the
creation of the Federal Reserve [Bank], a deal between
the bankers and the politicians whereby the bankers
promised some politicians backing and almost certain
re-election in the elections they contended; in
return, the politicians handed over to the bankers the
right to do nothing less than print the money for the
country. 'We'll do that for you," the bankers said,
and you can borrow from us.' It was passed on a Friday
afternoon with no warning and with Congress pretty
well empty. So much for democracy when the invisible
bankers really want something.

Kralik: The incredible implication of this is that the
Federal Reserve, which prints the greenbacks for the
American people, is a private bank.

Kealey: It is a private bank. The same thing happened
in Canada, after the customary twenty-year delay - in
1935. MacKenzie King had won, lost, won, lost four
elections in a row. He wanted to ensure his hold on
the Prime Ministership for a long time, so he in turn
gave the bankers The Bank of Canada.

Let us examine the implications of that. Before you
give away the Federal Bank there is no need for
consumer or income taxes.: you can manufacture an
amount of money based on the resources of the country,
including its capacity for labour. The value is
constantly changing as new minerals are found and the
labour force becomes more and more productive. In a
situation where the National Government prints money,
for every dollar sold to banks two percent remains
with the government: that two percent pays the bills.

Kealey: A government should not be there merely for
what it does today. There are nine reasons for a
government: health, education, welfare, energy,
transportation, communications, housing, food, and
clothing. Defence is not part of that: if you are not
fighting anybody, there is no need for defence. Some
countries in the world can't survive on their own
because they don't have the resources. There is
nothing in Canada that we do not have. In fact, we
could make a decision tomorrow that the critical mass
of all consumer products needed in Canada would be
made in Canada, from Canadian raw materials, by
Canadian labour: the result would be that everybody
would be employed.

Kralik: Incredible!

Kealey: We have the raw materials, the labour force,
but we don't have the plants. The raison d'etre of the
Free Trade Agreements being concluded throughout the
world is to consolidate international control over a
country by making sure that all of the parts needed
for the manufacturing of every thing are not made in
any one country.

Kralik: So that a country cannot be self-sufficient?

Kealey: The carburettors are built in one place, the
exhaust pipes in another, as are the tuners for your
VCR. All the parts have been disbursed in different
countries, all over the world. No one country can
manufacture the parts for everything produced within
their own borders. That is, with three notable
exceptions: Germany, Japan and the United States - the
European Community, the Pacific Community, and the
Atlantic Community. A One World government begins by
eliminating boundaries, ending up with three regions.

Kralik: Initially?

Kealey: Initially, and then merging them into a
One-World government under the United Nations. The
Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the US, and
Mexico is only the first step of an Agreement that
will encompass both the Americas, North and South.

Kralik: Exactly. The South American dimension was only
mentioned during the last week.

Kealey: But it has been planned all the way through.
You must remember too that the Free Trade Deal was not
a negotiation: it was transnational bankers saying to
the Governments involved:"This is what you are going
to do and here is an implementation schedule.'
Everything in the Free Trade Deal had to fit the
implementation schedule. The final time slot is 2005.

What is being created is a United Nations in which the
rich governments send money to build a fund, the
International Monetary Fund, causing the country from
which money was sent to borrow more and more money,
thus causing more and more debt. Money is then sent to
the poor countries, creating a debt there. So
everybody is indebted to the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund.

One branch of the Fund holds the money, the other
makes the decisions as to how it is to be used,
usually for projects that don't go anywhere: these
waste money and cause the debt to grow.

Then one day countries can't pay and the bailiff is
called. The bailiff is the United Nations Security
Council. The real assets of the world, therefore, are
re-possessed either by the bank or by the Security
Council and are put under the control of the United
Nations. Over time the resources of each country are
gathered under UN control.

The guy who was in charge of that section is now
working in Ontario as the Head of Ontario Hydro:
Maurice Strong. Would you like to know why Maurice
Strong is working in Ontario? It is because Bob Rae
[then-Premier, socialist and a Rhodes Scholar; the
current Ontario Premier, Conservative Mike Harris,
recently went on a several-day private fishing trip at
a remote camp with George Bush - just before the
Quebec "crisis" erupted in the neighbouring province!]
is in on the deal: he brought Maurice Strong in to do
what he does best.

What did Strong do first? He shut down some of the
nuclear plants. Why? Because as long as you have
nuclear plants you have too much electrical power. If
you shut them down, then you can convince people they
must dam more rivers. Make a Free Trade deal, move the
jobs out of Canada, cause unemployment, and the people
of Canada will scream: "Give us jobs! Give us jobs!"
Ultimately they will be told: "You want a job? We've
got some terrific jobs - building dams!"

Kralik: Is that why only yesterday Chretien signed the
Free Trade deal?

Kealey: Chretien is a puppet. He is the Ronald Reagan
of Canada. Today Mitchell Sharp is the Prime Minister
of Canada. Mitchell Sharp is our George Bush, and he
was not elected. He used to be Chretien's boss as
Minister of Finance, but today he's got his hand on
the back of the puppet [Prime Minister] Jean Chretien.


Journalists and radio-talk show hosts who would like
to interview Glen Kealey or Shelley Anne Clark should
at 819-778 1705 [fax: 613-747 1644].
Grand Chief of the Quebec Cree, Matthew Coon-Come, can
be reached by faxing 818-673 2606, or calling 613-761

"what has happened to him is outrageous"
Dr. Noam Chomsky, speaking of Kevin
Annett, August 7,

Read Kevin's personal story of
uncovering Genocide in
Canada, and the price he has paid for doing so:

Order "Love and Death in the Valley" by Kevin
Annett through
First Books at:



Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

"what has happened to him is outrageous"
Dr. Noam Chomsky, speaking of Kevin Annett, August 7, 2002

Read Kevin's personal story of uncovering Genocide in Canada, and the price he has paid for doing so:

Order "Love and Death in the Valley" by Kevin Annett through First Books at:

Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca