Preamble
As a conscious, intelligent person you have access to a remarkable reserve of intuitive knowing and gut feelings about all things. The ability to see behind the concealment that all evil uses to plan the destruction needed to give themselves power and wealth over all common people. You have a distinct, unique insight that allows you to see beyond the mundane and directly into the heart of all issues. This ability has been called "Common Sense" throughout the ages! The most effective “solution” to any critical challenge facing our nation and the world is to take a deep look at what is truly and honestly wanting and needed to improve not only America but our world as well. Not like our new age negative, hateful action and thinking, more like using your own innate abilities and foresight to see the truth of the matter and respond to it intelligently.
Slowly include a higher caliber of like-minded people into your life. Not necessarily rich, famous or super successful. More like deep thinkers with big and good hearts, healthy outlooks that are confident, wise and aware of this new world landscape and who care deeply about what matters to them and all of us!
The author of this essay is unknown. It was submitted to us by our friend A.K.
In a surreptitious move to support the vaccine narrative, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly changed the definition of a vaccine which they have held since at least February 24, 2011. At first glance, it might seem like a small change, but it has massive repercussions.
The meaning of words can change over time, and can be influenced by social, economic, political, religious and technological factors. Many of the words we use today have vastly different meanings than they did 10 or 100 years ago. However, changing medical words and definitions has a significant impact on bias in perception. One study demonstrated that a simple switch in terminology could result:
"... in a disease being perceived as more serious, more likely to be a disease, and more likely to be a rare condition. These findings regarding the conceptualization of disease have implications for many areas, including medical communication with the public, advertising, and public policy."
For example, medical literature has redefined the meaning of “health”over several decades to move from the absence of disease to a state of well-being. That definition continues to evolve in light of value-based health care, which some recommend should now include “specific patient needs, and the organizational, value-based system required to satisfy those needs.”
This change in definition then affects health care delivery, public perception and interpretation of the meaning of health. This strategy was not lost on the CDC when they removed critical words from the definition of a “vaccine” to change the public perception of any administered therapy that may impact a person’s immune system.
This opens the door to the administration of other “products” or “preparations” that may affect your immune system, still while calling it a vaccine. And, let’s face it, for much of the public, the word “vaccine” continues to have positive implications.
CDC Removes Critical Words From Vaccine Definition!
To fully understand the importance of the change, it’s crucial to note that, before the COVID pandemic, the definition of a vaccine had been relatively stable for nearly a couple decades with minor word changes occurring every few years. All through that time the intent of a vaccine — to give you immunity by protecting you from a specific disease — had remained basically the same.
For example, according to an archived snapshot of the CDC’s website, the definition of a vaccine February 24, 2011, was:
“A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.”
By July 2015, the wording had changed to:
“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed in the nose.”
The wording was the same in June 2017 and likewise in June 2019 and June 2020.
By August 26, 2021 however, the definition had changed slightly to add the words “to produce immunity”:
“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
Then, less than a week later, just days after the FDA gave final approval to Pfizer’s mRNA jab, the definition changed again, September 1, 2021 — this time, significantly. The definition of a vaccine now reads:
“A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
As you’ll note, the second sentence remains the same. It is the first part of the definition that has dramatically changed. In the latest definition, a vaccine:
Is no longer a “product” but instead is a “preparation” No longer directly stimulates the immune response, but is used to stimulate the system. It does not produce immunity! It stimulates the immune response against diseases, not against a specific disease. No longer protects a person from the disease. These dramatic changes were likely created to allow the CDC, FDA and other governmental agencies to call the genetic therapy experiment being administered worldwide a “vaccine” — while they knew full well the so-called “vaccine” was not created to either produce immunity or prevent transmission of disease. In fact, by any definition of a vaccine in use before 2021, this jab is NOT a vaccine.
Organizations Are Changing the Goal Posts
Alex Berenson was once a reporter for The New York Times and is now an award-winning author. He published a timeline of events on a Substack page that he calls “A Lawsuit in Three Acts.” In Act One is an August 26, 2021 screenshot of the CDC website, with the prior definition of a vaccine as you can see above. Act Two is a screenshot of a tweet Berenson posted August 28, 2021:
“It doesn't stop infection. Or transmission. Don't think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.”
Following the release of that tweet, Twitter ruled the information misleading and suspended his account for “violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules.” As Berenson writes, “This defamatory act prevents me from using my account anywhere in the world.”
Within days of Berenson’s ban, Act Three occurred. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine, removing the standard that had been in place for at least 20 years that vaccines produce immunity. In his last comment, Berenson alludes to the acts of censorship that have been ongoing in social media platforms since the beginning of this pandemic, writing, “Discovery’s gonna be awesome!”
On September 8, 2021, one of Berenson’s followers, Carol Jones, commented, “LOL!!! My lawyer husband just laughed when he read this. "That is a slam dunk.” As a side note, Merriam-Webster Dictionary’s definition of a vaccine once was:
"… a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”
However, before the CDC changed its definition, Merriam-Webster had already changed theirs, which now includes a secondary description of the experimental COVID-19 genetic therapy. Interestingly, when they made the change, the definition evolved from a simple, single line to a much more complex paragraph definition that is a reflection of the times we live in.
The movement toward changing the definition of a vaccine may help protect the pharmaceutical industry and health agencies from violating a Federal Trade Commission act that regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. According to this it is unlawful to say:
"... that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made."
And further, you cannot legally have a vaccine that does not meet the definition of a vaccine. Currently, the COVID-19 genetic therapy injection program does meet the vaccine definition of the CDC and Merriam-Webster — but only after the definitions changed.
What Is a Pandemic?
The definition of a vaccine is not the only thing that has changed since 2020. To continue promoting mandates, lock downs and emergency use authorization of genetic therapy injections, the infection must be causing a pandemic.
According to the World Health Organization, their original definition of a pandemic specified that there must be simultaneous epidemics experienced worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses.”
While the published documents with the definition of a pandemic have since been pulled offline and cannot be accessed any longer through the Wayback machine, the WHO published a paper refuting the allegations that they had changed the definition “for the simple reason that it has never formally defined pandemic influenza.”
They argued that while they had described a pandemic influenza, it was never a “formal definition.” In their explanation they say that since 2003 their pandemic preparedness page had contained this statement:
“An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
They claim that was changed in response to a query from a CNN reporter just weeks before they declared a swine flu pandemic after only 144 people died from the infection worldwide. The new statement removed the phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” and was revised to: “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.”
The Council of Europe apparently had the same question and cited this alteration in their page as evidence that the WHO could declare a pandemic without demonstrating the severity of the disease against which we didn’t have immunity.
Unfortunately, the number of excess deaths that can be attributed directly to COVID-19 is not likely to be the result of the infection itself, but from the CDC’s and NIAID’s suppression of successful treatment modalities that can save lives.
Vaccine Sales Pitch: Herd Immunity
Health experts promote the idea of herd immunity, hoping 100% of the public will become vaccinated. However, in July 2021 the news reported that 100 fully vaccinated crew members aboard the British aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth had tested positive while onboard. At the time, it was unclear whether any had symptoms.
This was one of the first reports that vaccinated individuals could have breakthrough infections, A/K/A, “vaccine failure.” Vaccine failure would indicate that herd immunity is impossible. But, of course, that depends on your definition of herd immunity.
In June 2020, WHOs definition was posted on their COVID-19 Q&A page and was in line with widely accepted standards for infectious diseases. Courtesy of the Wayback machine, the original definition was:
“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”
Since humans have been alive, immunity has developed from previous infection. Your immune system is designed to work in response to exposure to an infectious agent, not to a vaccine. However, since October 15, 2020, the WHO believes this is no longer the case, as they updated their definition of herd immunity to a “concept used for vaccination” or, rather, to support vaccination:
“Herd immunity, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission.”
The page was again updated on December 31, 2020:
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission.
To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”
As you can see from the areas I put in boldface in the two definitions above, the WHO definition of a vaccine and the CDC definition are not congruent. In this statement, the WHO says "that vaccines protect the individual from getting the disease or passing on the pathogen." The current CDC definition says that vaccines merely “stimulate the body's immune response against diseases” without mention of immunity, protection or passing pathogens.
This means the definition of a vaccine by the WHO does not cover the function of the COVID-19 genetic therapy program, since the mRNA gene therapy’s purpose is only to lessen symptoms.
The NIAID admits that after the mRNA shots people can still get breakthrough infections (so they aren’t protected from getting the disease) and will have enough pathogens in their nasal cavity to spread the disease (they are passing on the pathogen).
Even with the changes the WHO made to their definition of herd immunity, it is apparent that the COVID-19 injection program will never meet the standards of herd immunity set by the WHO. The only question is how long will it take the WHO to change their definition again????
Postscript By Thomas Paine
Living in a World Where Goal Posts Are Constantly Changing
The CDC, also known as the U.S. Government, has changed the definition of "Vaccine." WHY? WHY NOW? Well, the unknown author of the above essay brings up several good reasons, the least of which is to legally conform to the Federal Trade Commission Act that regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. Some FTC laws move past Civil into a Criminal realm. All FTC laws that are viewed as crimes come into play only if the Federal Prosecutors can prove "Knowing and Willful Illegal Intent." This might require a massive and wide sweeping, I would guess, FBI investigation when it comes to major drug companies.
Also, there is the U.S. PREP ACT (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act). On February 4, 2021 under President Biden's administration, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Moderna now have 100% total immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their Virus "Vaccine." This includes illness and death. (If intentional, willful and knowingly - that's a very big problem for drug companies!) Please note the word "Vaccine." With the PREP ACT in essence the U.S. Government acts as an insurance policy for them with the U.S. Treasury obligated to pay out if need be. By the way, that's your money, the U.S. taxpayers! There is a little known U.S. government program called the "Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program" linked to the PREP ACT. To make a claim under this program you need to prove "Willful Misconduct." The legal action can only be taken in the local Washington D.C. Federal Court. The burden, high standard and overwhelming proof needed to gain a ruling of "Willful Misconduct" is stacked very heavily against anyone filing this kind of claim. A person's legal fees could run as high as $500,000 or more. The program has only paid out 29 claims in decades. The drug company's immunity has no "geographic limitations" meaning someone from Europe winning a lawsuit in Europe against one of the drug companies cannot under any circumstances enforce such foreign judgments within the United States. This United States immunity will expire on October 1, 2025.
Interestingly, the only person who can grant immunity under the U.S. PREP ACT is the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. President Biden selected Xavier Becerra. What about him? Well, he received his law degree from Stanford Law School and was admitted to the California Bar in 1985. In 1992 he was elected to Congress representing the 30th district and won reelection in 1994. He was appointed assistant to the Speaker of the House for the 110th Congress, working closely with Congresswoman and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Becerra was on the shortlist for potential democratic nominations to the Vice Presidency by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He accepted Gov. Jerry Brown's offer to be the Attorney General of California on December 1, 2016. The California Legislature confirmed Becerra to the post on January 23, 2017. He succeeded Kamala Harris who was elected to the U.S. Senate. I'll stop here, since you might be asking what are his qualifications to head up Health and Human Services. No, there is no medical training or medical educational background that I can find dealing with medicine, medical services, medical science or anything whatsoever related to human health. He seems to be a lawyer turned politician. He was confirmed by the Senate in a vote of 50-49, with all but one Democrat present and one Republican, Susan Collins, voting in favor. This was the narrowest vote for any of Biden's cabinet positions.
So, getting back to the question WHY NOW change the definition of a Vaccine?
An item in the essay struck an odd note! Why, out of the clear blue sky, would Merriam-Webster change the meaning of "Vaccine" into a complex detailed definition that is an exact echo of what the CDC now claims is the meaning of the word "Vaccine"? Here's what I found:
Mirriam-Webster has a very long history starting when Noah Webster published his first dictionary in 1806. In 1964 Merriam-Webster, Inc. was purchased by Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. As the world started to be connected via the Internet, people moved away from printed Encyclopedias and Dictionaries. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. was struggling to stay in business. In 1996 Syrian-Lebanese billionaire Jacob E. Safra purchased Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. and became its Chairman. He transitioned the company away from the print medium. Over a short period of time, he laid off thousands of employees involved with printing, sales and book distribution. He soared into the Internet as a place to market both the Encyclopedia and Dictionary. Today, both are only available online. But, after being the first, he now has major competition from Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia and now Google is entering the game with its own Encyclopedia. So, Mr. Safra is staying on top of his game by giving the world a new definition for "Vaccine" and will be in alignment with the CDC's new meaning. Wonder if Wikipedia and Encyclopedia.com follow and change their definition of "Vaccine"? Is the entire world going to have a new meaning for the word Vaccine?
At our website under Previous Newsletters - issue "February 1, 2021" - I reference a CDC website that gave the definition of a "Vector Vaccine." This web page has been updated to give the impression that the Vector Vaccine they describe contains "slices or parts" of the COVID-19 virus. This is seriously misleading. NONE of the three U.S. vaccines contain any element of the COVID-19 virus! Our web page also gives examples of a number of well-known "Vector Vaccines" all using a part of the exact virus they are supposed to "attack" and kill within our bodies. "Vector Vaccines" only target the exact virus that they were designed for. They do NOT harm any other part of the body. They will not cure or help an ingrown toenail.
To understand the actual Ingredients in the vaccines, please read carefully and completely the February 1, 2021 (Pfizer & Moderna) and March10, 2021 (Johnson & Johnson) Previous Newsletters. You will note that Pfizer uses SAR-CoV-2, Moderna uses mRNA and Johnson & Johnson uses EBOV which is Ebola Virus.
We are left to wonder WHY the change in meaning at this time. How does that help all the drug companies' profits? Could something be looming over the horizon that they know about and we don't?
Thirty-two Months and Counting!
The first virus inoculations were administered to adults in December 2021 about a month after Joe Biden was declared winner of the Presidential election. So for a year and 10 months the entire world has been taking part in the very biggest medical "drug treatment experiment" known to mankind. Now I'm reluctant to call it a Vaccine after the meaning of the word has changed so much. At this point, I would never have thought that while taking aspirin for a headache, I was being orally vaccinated with a "vaccine"! Does that mean I will never again get a headache?
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration was created on June 30, 1906, 115 years ago. No U.S. government entity has ever done more or better with the task of protection, keeping secure and safe the well being and health of its citizens, except for the U.S. military! There is no other government organization that comes remotely close. For over a century its officials, doctors, medical scientists and employees have worked with great pride, dedication and care! The FDA is world renowned. Any product approved by the U.S. FDA is nearly automatically open to markets anywhere in the world.
I must admit, I cannot find the words that even come close to describing the inhuman, absolutely impossible, insanely pressured situation the FDA faced in December 2020 with the early impact of the virus. At the time and to this day, the idea of the virus being a bio-weapon is still on the table.
Where was the pressure coming from? You name it!!!! U.S. politics and politicians were all trying to make this one or that one look good or bad and in the meantime, they all started to look ugly depending on which team you rooted for! Much of the world was waiting and hoping America could save them. Members of one particular political party, smiling and laughing, were looking at how to take political advantage saying, "Never let a crisis go to waste"! This, while people were dying every day. The doctors, facing the dead and dying each hour, took matters into their own hands by experimenting with known drugs to save the lives of their patients. If you were a family doctor, you would need a very cold heart of stone not to be devastated seeing people you have come to know, families that you have treated in many cases from one generation to the next, lose family members instantly right before their eyes. And when word spread throughout the medically community that Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine, which had been found to be safe for many decades having been used hundreds of millions of times was working well to stop the virus, especially when administered early, the doctor were slammed with a sledgehammer! The FDA banned the ten cent per pill Hydroxychloroquine for use in treating the Virus and threatened doctors with the loss of their license to practice medicine if they used the medication on COVID-19 Virus patients. Where did that pressure come from? A source so powerful that a mainstream media campaign actually started with the goal to discredit Hydroxychloroquine with FAKE claims that people who had taken the medication were having heart attacks by the hundreds! Once President Trump spoke up in support of the medication's use, the mainstream media only increased their anti-Hydroxychloroquine campaign five fold.
The Japanese scientist Satoshi Omura who discovered and developed Ivermectin more than 30 years ago recently received the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine. Ivermectin is best known for its extraordinarily broad spectrum of activity against nematodes, the roundworms that cause a large proportion of the most common neglected diseases on our planet. It is used to treat millions of people at risk of contracting devastating diseases, such as onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, and also plays an important role in the control of intestinal helminth infections. Because of its excellent safety profile and broad spectrum of activity, Ivermectin is catalogued by the World Health Organisation as an essential medicine and is regarded by many as a "magic bullet" for global health. The effectiveness of Ivermectin against many diseases associated with poverty makes it a candidate to be one of the next breakthroughs in global health owing to its potential for improving quality of life and reducing mortality rates in low-income countries. The drug works so well to improve human health that it slid into veterinary medicine and was found to be a lifesaver for horses and livestock suffering with intestinal worms. Mainstream media launched a massive lying attack against Ivermectin claiming it's a "horse dewormer pill," that it's not good for human use, that people are consuming the livestock product to treat COVID-19 and risking their lives. All lies! No mention was made of the millions upon millions of people worldwide over the last 30 years whose lives have been saved by this large spectrum drug that costs about a "nickel" a pill.
If you wonder who had this kind of influence, power and real clout to manipulate the American people, U.S. Government and mainstream media worldwide, wonder no longer!
To date in the United States: 416 million doses have been administered, 191 million people have been fully vaccinated, 58% of the known U.S. population is not vaccinated.
Sad and tragic, those who were vaccinated six to eight months ago are now in the same "boat" as those not vaccinated. How many of those "fully" vaccinated people were told and understood that the vaccine can ONLY be given once, they would still need to wear masks and the vaccine would expire in six months to eight months depending on how substantial the person's immunity system was prior to vaccination? That it really isn't a vaccine but rather a drug treatment to push your immunity system to the max! With NO research or understanding of what the long-term effects of this immunity monster boost would be or do to your immunity system.
Fear is powerful, very powerful! The fear of death is the most powerful.
"The enemy is fear. We think it is hate, but, it is fear!" - Mahatma Gandhi
As each month rolls by, more of the truth, understanding, knowledge and facts related to everything regarding the Virus from China and all the hundreds of "dots" will be connected! It all will surface. The truth has a way of doing that!
Next stop is this link:
COVID Rising DeathsIf you are planning on being vaccinated or getting a booster shot, read this first!
Correct Administration Of Injections!We are continuously developing our website. We are placing all past e-mail Newsletters on our website for your review and for those newly subscribed to become acquainted with.
Your thoughts and comments are always welcomed! All subscribers emails to us are immediately copied to a computer, NOT connected to the Internet. Then the orignial email will be deleted and removed from the Trash Bin!
No subscribers' material will be republished without permission and only a first initial will be used to denote the originator. Feel free to "Contact Us!"
If you have family members or friends who you think would find this Newsletter interesting and informative, please forward it to them and urge them to subscribe!
 | Powered by YMLP.com | |
| | ||