Attorney (and Democrat) Philip J. Berg

Supreme Court Requires Obama to Respond to Berg's Writ of Certiorari by December 1.

Huge Implications We Must All Ponder.....

IAHF List:

It would be the ultimate irony if the US Constitution and a Supreme Court ruling on December 1 were used to trigger off massive inner city rioting that would enable Bush and Obama's ruling elite string pullers to impose martial law, but that could actually happen- and we can't afford not to examine the possability, or the other possability- that the Supreme Court might have been ordered by their Ruling Elite Stringpullers to allow Obama to be inserted ANYWAY for several reasons outlined below....

The Supreme Court has issued a December 1 deadline for Obama to respond to attorney Philip Berg's Writ of Certiorari in which this life long Democrat provides extremely hard hitting evidence to indicate that Obama was not legally qualified to run for the Presidency on a basis of the Constitution, and on laws in effect in 1961. Berg is not a lightweight, he's a former deputy Attorney General from the State of Pennsylvania, and the Supreme Court is not ignoring his Writ. (see )


Article 2, section 1 of the US Constitution specifically requires a candidate for President to have been "natural born".

To be considered "Natural Born" under the laws in effect in 1961 when Obama was born:

If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, AND at least five of those 10 years had to be after the age of 16.

Based on that alone, there is no way Obama can legally be sworn in as President because his father was a Kenyan citizen, and his US Citizen mother was 18 when he was born. Under the law, for Obama to qualify as "Natural Born" she would have had to be 21 years old or older in order to meet the requirement of at least 5 of those 10 years being after the age of 16. (16+5= 21) This means that Obama should have been naturalized, (which would have made him inelegible to run for the Presidency), and if he was not naturalized, then he is an illegal alien.

 Lets look at Berg's Writ of Certiorari:

In Point 15 of the Writ, Berg states:

" There are questions as to where Obama was actually born, in the United States, or abroad, and then registered his birth. There are further questions regarding Obama's citizenship, if he ever held such, being expatriated and his failure to regain his citizenship by taking the oath of Allegiance once he turned 18 years of age.There are additional questions regarding Obama's multi citizenships with foreign countries, which he still maintains. To date, Obama has refused to prove he is qualified under the US Constitution and his eligability to run for President of the United States."

In Point 20 Berg States "Wayne Madsen, journalist with Online Journal was a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008 stating the GOP sent a research team to Mombasa Kenya and located a Certificate registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr at a Maternity Hospital to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a US Citizen." (This squares with the statement made by his own grandmother who was caught on video stating that he was born in Kenya, see below.)


Obama may not be able to clear all of these hurdles Berg has placed before him,and the Supreme Court could demand that he stand down. He could actually be put on trial and imprisoned for fraud over this. If this happens, I predict the inner cities of this country will then explode like a volcano with rioting that could easily lead to martial law. [Ponder what happened in '92 in Los Angeles following the Rodney King verdict:

 This could have been planned with this outcome in mind. It seems very likely that the Federal Election Commission, and the Democratic National Committee (which are both named as Defendants in Berg's lawsuit) were asked by the ruling elite to not vett Obama for eligability.

 This is quite a minefield he's being forced to run through under the close scrutiny of the Supreme Court. He won't be able to continue using the forged, photoshopped certificate of live birth that he's been trying to foist off on us so far: (See,_phony_photos,_and_felony_fraud.thtml Scroll down to Ron Polarik, PhD.s "Final Report-  Obama's Born Conspiracy: Forged Images, Phony Photos, and Felony Fraud."

He'll have no choice but to produce both sides of a certified original long form birth certificate, which he's been refusing now to product for a very long time. I seriously doubt he has one, his grandmother has stated on video that he was born in Kenya ( and I believe her:  but even if he does produce both sides of a certified long form birth certificate, I don't see a way past the fact that his mom had not been a US Citizen for the required 5 years after the age of 16 (unless the elite have ordered the Supreme court to overlook this.)

Ron Polarik goes into great detail to show that the supposed "Certificates of Live Birth" posted by "Fact Check" and "Fight the Smears" were in fact forgeries. He also demonstrates that the supposedly "Impartial"  is actually owned by the Annanberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, a center run by Obama supporters and funded by Annanberg Public Policy Center. He shows that once he began his expose, the original phony COLB was removed from this and other websites it had been posted on and it was reposted in lower resolution, with fewer pixels, to make it harder to scrutinize.


Those of you who have been on the IAHF list a long time realize that I did not vote for either McCain or Obama, and that I do not trust how our so called "elections are run" since I regard them to be CIA installations in which anything and everything can be rigged. I believe McCain/ Palin were never anything but unelectable stalking horses in the "race" to insure a ruling elite desired outcome.

The only question in my mind now is what will happen NEXT?

Either the Supreme Court will rule against Berg, or they will not. If they rule in favor of Berg, I predict that will trigger off martial law. I don't see how it could not. If the elite want martial law right now, they could easily get it, but they might not want it yet for some reason. If they don't rule in favor of Berg, that would be the elite's way of saying to all of us "Your Constitution does not matter, we'll enforce it when it suits us, and when it doesn't, we won't."

Why the Supreme Court might find in favor of Obama despite all evidence:

Check out S.2433 The Global Poverty Act which was sponsored by Obama. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends. We are bankrupt. We're the world's biggest debtor nation. We can't afford this evil collectivist bullshit. Rich assholes like Obama are insulated from the effects of SCAMS such as this, but the little guy gets stepped on hard.  See

Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.'s "Millennium Project," says that the U.N. plans to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the "Millennium Development Goals," this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels. 

So, Obama wants a UN tax imposed on US citizens under false pretenses (global warming). The UN is a communist organization. Always has been. The US never should have joined the UN, and we damn well should get out of it for this and many other reasons not the least of which is that the UN intends to impose genocidal limits on allowable vitamin potencies- I have been fighting against this since 1996 and have attended several UN meetings first hand where I've seen what a SCAM the UN is.

Along with the effort to impose unscientific so called "Safe Upper Limits" on allowable vitamin potencies, Global warming is also collectivist hoax. There is no scientific evidence of it whatsoever. Weather patterns are in fact cyclical, and the primary determinant factor has been sun spot activity. During periods of increased solar flare activity (sun spots) there is global warming. At other times there is global cooling. See Canadian Scientists Fear Global Cooling


In the crazy world we're living in, its anyone's guess which direction the Supreme Court has been ordered by their ruling elite puppet masters to act regarding Berg's lawsuit. They might rule against Obama in order to trigger off Martial law, or they might not feel ready for it yet because they haven't disarmed us.

They might allow Obama to be installed on us despite all the evidence in order to shove S.2433 through on us which would impose a UN carbon tax, and they might install him on us to insure they can pass as much gun control legislation as possible in order to tighten the screws a bit more before bringing about martial law at a later date, possibly via economic collapse or another false flag event, a sequel to 911.

Theres no way any of us can know for sure which way these Machevellian bastards will decide to go, but it pays to be prepared for whatever they decide to do. If you live in or near a big US City, I recommend you get out prior to December 1, and wait to see what the Supreme court does. If they rule against Obama, you'd better watch the news really closely to see if it sparks off inner city rioting before you return to the City.

If the Supremes rule against Berg, just keep in mind everything else I'm saying. If the Supreme Court rules against Berg, we can count on Waxman, Dingell, Kennedy and Durbin making a huge effort to repeal the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, and we'll need to be ready to rapidly jump into the breach if they do.

One thing you will never get from IAHF is the sort of phony "alert" recently generated by a well known controlled opposition group which periodically issues sensationalistic "alerts" urging you to "Flood the FDA" with comments. The FDA has a very long history of IGNORING all comments sent in to them. They're unelected bureaucrats, and they don't give a damn what we want. This group makes all kinds of false claims of having "stopped" the FDA in the past by "flooding them with comments", but the fact remains- we only have political leverage over ELECTED officials, not over unelected bureaucrats at the FDA or at Codex meetings.

This group SHOULD be assisting IAHF in calling for Congressional oversight on FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico, but they never have, all they do is generate DISTRACTIONS from what is needed (such as urge you to waste time flooding the FDA with comments on things.) This is consistent with their generating 7 spin pieces against our message when IAHF and allied groups tried to kill CAFTA, recognizing the tie in between this move toward regional government as one more thing to rope us into Codex. See  Action Steps to Stop Codex from being ushered into USA via FDAs Trilateral Cooperation Charter

Please mass forward this alert and post it to your site!

If you appreciate this analysis- please donate to IAHF to help us with our GENUINE health freedom work:

IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd., Point Roberts WA 98281 USA or via paypal at